Sunday, May 26, 2013
The Tiananmen Square Massacre Deal
THE TIANANMEN SQUARE MASSACRE DEAL A delegation representing Aeropspatiale, the French arms manufacturing and trading company, arrived in Beijing in on a very warm and humid morning in mid May, 1989, to carry on final negotiations for the sale of helicopters to People's Liberation Army of China. Discussions regarding the purchase of four specially equipped Dolphin helicopters for use by the PLA Navy, began in earnest when the Aerospatiale delegation met with representatives from Poly Technologies, the principal arms dealing agent of the PLA, on Friday morning, the 24th of May. We had recently purchased 24 Gazelles from Aerospatiale for the Army Aviation Corps and several Super Frelon helicopters for the Navy and augmented these purchases with the acquisition of a squadron of Sikorski Blackhawks from the United States, So, in one sense, for us, this was simply ongoing business. But in another sense, the timing could not have been worse. When we received the fax at Poly Technologies, where I was working, on the last day of April informing us of the impending arrival of the French delegation we were not at all sure that they were serious. Were they merely going through the motions or in the midst of this crises were they actually expecting to negotiate a deal? When I read the fax, I couldn't believe my eyes. I remember saying, `What? This isn't true! Is this a joke? Can you be sure that the delegation is coming and that final stage preparations can take place in this pressure cooker atmosphere?. This is impossible!' Very simply, it was unbelievable." But the top Chinese naval officials had decided earlier in the spring that it badly needed the four Dolphins because of the potential dangers involved in occupying and holding some of the Spratly(Nansha) Islands in the South China Sea. In March of 1988 the Chinese and Vietnamese navies fought a brief battle over the islands. The Spratlys are often on the minds of the naval planners because the international problems there were potentially explosive. Several countries including the PRC, Vietnam, Taiwan, the Philippines, Malaysia and Brunei claimed the islands. The Navy, as a result, for a long time has been concerned about building up its ship borne helicopter forces to support and defend Chinese claims in the Spratlys. By the time the French delegation arrived in Beijing, the streets of the city were in near chaos. Ever since the death of Hu Yaobang on April 15th the city had been swept up in demonstrations and increasing turmoil. On April 18th, 6,000 students from Beijing University marched to Tiananmen Square and sat down in protest in front of the Great Hall of the People. The Democracy Spring had begun. Television cameras from the West transmitted the events in Bejing around the world and as a result the attention and concern of much of the world turned gradually to Beijing and the activities of the students and their supporters among the workers and in the government . Martial law was declared at 10:00 am on May 20th and one hour later satellite transmissions from China to other countries was stopped. On May 23rd, one day before negotiations with Aerospatiale began, more than one million people took to the streets in Beijing to protest the martial law declaration. There are 72 critical intersections leading from the outskirts of Beijing to Tiananmen Square. Block those intersections and you stop all traffic in the city. Block the intersections and no army can get to Tiananmen Square. By the end of May, that had happened. But it wasn't students who blocked the intersections. It was the workers of Beijing the common people. I saw the crisis quickly intensify. The workers who blocked the intersections knew exactly what they were doing and their efforts were loosely coordinated. I believe that is what frightened the government most. They could deal with the students and the foreign press corps. But not the common people, they could not face down all those people. And there must have been, I would estimate, at least 100,000 people taking part in the effort to bring traffic to a standstill." Each night the working people of the city drove buses, taxis and cars into the middle of the 72 intersections. They pulled concrete dividers from the middle of the streets across the traffic lanes and kept them there throughout the night. There were 300,000 troops around Beijing on May 19th. But they had trouble moving into the city. Truckloads of troops that drove into the city during the day found themselves stranded in the street at night. The People's Liberation Army was trapped by the People and they sat parked, helpless, and frustrated along side streets. "The people were heroes from that point on. This is the great untold story the story of the people, the common people, not just the students." But how long could this continue? By the time the Aerospatiale delegation arrived, I felt something very serious was about to happen in the streets at any moment. You could sense it, you could almost feel it in the air. Troops ringed the city and were concentrated at several points near Tiananmen Square. But there was no way for them to get to the students in the square except by crashing through those barricaded intersections." The people warily watched the troops. The troops and the government warily watched the people. The troops didn't move during the day when the students and workers and newsmen could clearly see what they were doing. They dare not. And at night after 7 pm, they couldn't move either. The people at the barricades stayed up all night talking and arguing about the future of the country. They talked, they complained, they laughed. This is the first time since 1949, some of them said, that they were really free, that they could do or say whatever they wanted. "They could openly criticize the government for the first time. And they were not afraid any more. Each night I rode my bicycle from our offices in the Citic building to my apartment. We were working late on the French contract and so I seldom left the office before dark. I stopped at these intersections and listened to the speeches and the conversations and I saw the glow and the confidence on the faces of these common people. I felt a thrill and a pride in being Chinese that I had never before felt. I fell in love with these nameless heroes. And I felt ashamed of what I was doing every day at Poly Technologies." "In this atmosphere, we negotiated with the French for the purchase the Dolphin helicopters that the Navy insisted they so desperately needed. "Later when we told our American and British friends what had happened and explained the timing of the deal to them, they just laughed. And they said, 'Oh, sure, that's the French!" "That's the French,' they insisted. 'They're just money oriented. Politics and ideals count for nothing with them.' They were never surprised at what the French did. Yet, there were time, I know, when they behaved the same way. "The French have been the principal contractors for the Chinese military in the past several years. One of the things that makes negotiating with them relatively easy is that the they know how to do business in China. They know where the power really resides in China. They know which buttons to push and when, which officials are approachable behind the scenes and which are not. They are the experts in this field. So there was seldom any major problem with them in that area. And they had few problems clearing transactions with their own government. Under their defense ministry, the French had established a supervisory group that was known to us simply as the DCN. The organization supervises France's defense oriented research and production for export. They also assess and analyze the needs of potential foreign customers. It's a very powerful organization and many of the famous generals and admirals serve in DCN following their retirement from the military. DCN maintains an office in Beijing and has representatives present in the city at all times. Aerospatiale also has a permanent office in Beijing. The Aerospatiale delegation of about fifteen people was led by a Mr. Samuel, the director of the overseas marketing division of the company. The other members of the group were experts either on technical specifications or on price quotations or on commercial aspects. "We Chinese who took part in the negotiations were worried, but we didn't talk openly about it. Who was not worried at that time? I watched the drama unfolding daily in the streets. I was for the students, but I couldn't leave work. I couldn't go to the Square to encourage them and talk with them. I had to prepare the contracts for the signings. I had to work very hard in those last days of May and the first days of June often putting in eighteen hour days at the office. The French delegations customarily stayed at the Great Wall Hotel, which has an excellent French restaurant. They normally drove from there to Poly's offices at the Citic(China International Trust and Investment Corporation) building on Jianguomen Avenue, a trip that previously took only 20 to 40 minutes by limousine and taxi. But in late May many of the taxi drivers of the city were on strike and the streets were often blocked and impassable. Having been warned of this, the French delegation registered in the Beijing Hotel on Chang'an Boulevard adjacent to Tiananmen Square and also at the Jing Lun Hotel(Beijing Toronto a Chinese Canadian joint venture) within walking distance of the Citic building. The French, no doubt, saw the turmoil in the city as they made their way from the airport to their hotels. They knew what was going on outside, but it appeared they were completely unmoved by it. They just didn't seem to care. There was business to be done. "On May 25th, the second day of the negotiations, PLA helicopters starting flying over Tiananmen Square to observe and photograph the students and to drop pamphlets. We could see them from our office windows like giant wasps circling and hovering ominously in the distance. It was just incredible they were the same Gazelles sold to us earlier by Aerospatiale! "We had imported 24 of them early in 1988. They had been purchased especially for China's newly formed Army Aviation Corps, stationed at a specially designated airfield in Tong Xian County, a remote suburb of Beijing. It was from that airfield that the Gazelles took off and flew over Tiananmen Square. Several of the pilots on those Gazelle's owed their expertise at handling the craft to the fact that they had been well trained in France. The French also sent pilots and technicians to China to train crews for flying and maintaining the Gazelles. "One of the selling points of the Gazelle is its simplicity. It is very easy to handle and is quite small with only enough space for a pilot and co pilot. Yet it can be equipped with anti tank guns, rockets or even missiles if that is required for the mission. Poly Technologies purchased them for the PLA theoretically for tank killing purposes. But on the 27th of May they, quite obviously, were assigned another task. "I can tell you that more than once I looked out the window and saw those helicopters make a wide turn and pass over our building before racing back toward the Square and I wondered, `My God, what have we done? And what are we doing here now?' "And so from our windows, we watched the Gazelles hovering ominously over the square. It was very clear, like watching a horrifying movie. My God, they flew so low, you know, and sometimes made their passes around the Citic building and they came so close we could see the air force insignia on the side `August 1st, 1921,' the day the army was formed in Jing Gang Mountain in 1921. On one unforgettable occasion I could even glimpse the faces of the pilot and co pilot. But the French were not to be distracted during the negotiations. They knew the Gazelles flying over Tiananmen Square to observe and harass the students had been manufactured and sold to us by them. And far from being embarrassed by that fact, they seemed rather pleased by the expertise with which the pilots now handled the aircraft. I watched them nudge each other once as the helicopters flew nearby. The PLA Navy also sent their own representatives to the negotiating sessions with Aerospatiale in civilian clothes, of course. In China, when foreigners are present at an event, military personnel must wear civilian attire. The government does not like foreigners to feel that the military chooses to deal with them directly, even when they do. But the military quite clearly was represented directly at these negotiations. The head of the Chinese military delegation was Mr. Xie Tie Niu(his name means "Iron Ox"), a navy captain, which is equivalent to an army colonel. He is the Director of the Naval International Procurement Division and his presence was essential at the negotiating table. He was accompanied by two other officers from his division.Captain Xie was newly promoted, and fairly young for his rank in his mid 30s. He had become very influential within the military and got along well with foreign businessmen. He is a striking figure unusually handsome and quite dashing in his confident gestures and appearance. His soft, clear skin, rosy cheeks and thick, perfect patent leather hair indicate that he was from a wealthy, well connected and powerful family. Unlike most of his fellow officers, Tie Niu doesn't smoke, but he is devoted to social drinking and womanizing yet not to the extent that either of these entertaining diversions cause personal or professional problems for him. He is an excellent dancer, and unabashedly romantic. Women adore him and he adores them. He is the envy of many of his young fellow officers since he has several mistresses all of them are strikingly beautiful. These women are, moreover, each independent individuals some of them even married and so Tie Niu is proud of the fact that he never has to concern himself with supporting them. He enjoys life and life has been good to him. He has a deep, resonant, commanding voice and is seldom not the center of attention either on the dance floor, at a cocktail party or at the negotiating table. Another military negotiator at the meetings was naval captain Xiao Bo Ying, son of the late and very influential marshall and founder of the PLA Navy, Xiao Jingguang, the first naval admiral and the first commander in chief of the PLA Navy. Admiral Xiao, who had actually joined the Communist Party earlier than Mao Zedong, had been handpicked by Mao to head the Navy. He died three years ago. His son, Bo Ying, who basks in the glow and the influence of his father's career and power, is with the Technology and Equipment Division of the Navy and is in charge of aviation aspects of the Navy. He was present at the negotiations because he works in the helicopter sector of his division. On the civilian side, I was present at some of the negotiations, representing Poly Technologies. Also present at the final stage was the general manager of the company, He Ping, son in law of Deng Xiao Ping and He Datong, vice president of the company. But the individual primarily in charge of the project for Poly and the one I spent the most time with during the negotiations was Mr. Chun Kungmin, an unusually hard working and intense man. In addition to being a top notch negotiator, Mr. Chun also an eccentric. He is in his early 40s and of medium height. His wire rimmed glasses along with his constant pensive demeanor gave him the appearance of an intellectual. Originally from Guangdong Province, his absolute devotion to business was never quite concealed by the occasional flash of an official smile. Twenty years as an Air Force officer had somehow taught him to look serious even when he laughed. He wasn't completely devoid of a sense of humor he just looked that way. He was the perfect arms negotiator. His thoughts were utterly and absolutely indecipherable from his expressions. He drank only on ceremonial occasions and then only as much as was absolutely required. He did not enjoy music and the marchers in the street were merely an obstruction to him, a natural phenomenon that increased the time necessary for him to get to work. He had no vices I could recognize. He didn't smoke cigarettes and he didn't seem to be interested in women either. He was married, but he never spoke of his wife. I don't even know if he had children. He never mentioned them. Sometimes during the negotiations he stayed in the office overnight typing up paragraphs of a letters or documents without appearing tired in the morning. Not surprisingly, he was a devotee of physical fitness. He kept his business attire in a locker in the office, and at the end of his day, he'd slip into shorts, sneakers and a tee shirt and then run several miles down Jianguomen and Chang'an Avenues often in the dark before picking up his bicycle or catching a bus home. Then he'd run back to work the next morning, shower at work and crawl back into a suit. He was known to staff at the office for this unusual routine. In the winter he not only ran outdoors, but he swam in unheated open air pools. The weather didn't phase him. He ran back and forth to work in the coldest winter snowstorm or on the hottest summer days. He told me once that he got into that habit of running great distances when he was serving in the Air Force, where he had been the chief French interpreter for ten years. He could never break the habit. And so, although he still lived in the Air Force Compound in a Western Suburb of Beijing, there was never a problem of Kungmin not showing up for work because of a breakdown in the public transportation system or the taxi service. Should the bus system fail, he would bicycle and run to work and show up as eager to work as those who walked or bicycled only a few blocks. So altogether about six people from the navy were present, in civilian clothes, along with five people from Poly Technologies. The French had about 15 representatives present, for a total of 26 negotiators a relatively large group. On the first day of talks we compared notes and exchanged our views on preparation of the final documents which would lead to a formal contract. The discussions took place in two groups, one for technical aspects of the sale and the other for commercial aspects. The naval representatives appeared to believe right from the start that they were in a favorable bargaining position with Aerospatiale, and they really pressed the French, saying that they intended to move ahead expeditiously with the purchase, they needed the Dolphins, and the only thing holding back an agreement was the price quotations by the French. So they urgently requested further concessions on prices. But the French were unimpressed by this position and held firm day after day. They insisted absolutely that there could be no further reductions in their quotations. My suspicions about this position proved, in time, to be correct. I had dealt with the French previously, and I believed that informal talks had taken place elsewhere prior to these formal negotiations. And I learned in time that indeed, through their special intermediaries, the French had contacted not only the top officials at Poly but also the top naval admirals, who were not present at these meetings. The admirals always played their games in this way, making promises and deals in other rooms that we never knew about. They were a shadow power when it came to negotiations with the French, always felt but seldom seen. And because of this the French, knowing what the final deal would be, invariably, could stand firm on this or that position. The French intelligence system was excellent. They knew everything about our situation. They had learned before negotiations that we had $US45 million in our pocket and that we had to spend it. They knew also that no matter how hard we pressed them they did not have to give in because they also knew that we absolutely had to buy the helicopters and to spend the money before the end of the year. If we didn't, we were obligated to return what was left of the financial allocation back to our superiors, the General Staff, and then there would be no profit at all for Poly. The General Staff didn't really care how much we spent and the French knew it, but we didn't know that they knew this. We at Poly always told the General Staff how much we needed and they allotted us the money at the start of the year. And so the French knew everything. And they knew that if they made the best bargain possible for themselves, a share of the profits would then be channeled to the admirals of our navy and could ease the way for future deals. Any deal on our terms would channel profits to Poly Technologies and make future negotiations more difficult. "The naval officers at the negotiations believed, apparently, if they pressed the French and at the same time showed determination that, as in the past, the seller would make some concessions just to ease the deal through. This is a common practice. And the guys from the Navy knew that. But what they didn't know was that the French knew what their position was and knew there need be no concessions. I knew what was going on from the opening negotiating session. I had been through this with the French before, several times. By the way they stuck adamantly and confidently to their original bargaining position, I could tell that the fix was in an agreement had already been arrived at behind the scenes. We were just going through the motions while the real substance of the agreement had been worked out elsewhere. "There were leaks, important ones, at the very highest level of the navy. And, as always, the French knew everything. And so on the one hand we were saying to them, `If you don't make further concessions there will be no deal.' And they knew this was just bullshit. There would be a deal, whether they made concessions or not. So there would be no concessions "The top navy brass had been in touch with the French, through their intermediary, and made their own agreement. And, as always, they had been given special consideration had been bribed I had seen this before, too. But their subordinates were clean, the ones at the negotiating so seriously at the table each morning. "Even without their behind the scenes maneuvering, I felt uneasy negotiating with Aerospatiale in the first place, I can tell you. I mean that we knew full well that products manufactured by the French are cheap, undependable and poorly manufactured. The quality is simply inferior. And yet we have signed so many contracts with the French. Why? The answer is easy: their contacts and the special consideration given the top brass. It's that simple. The French were the number one Western arms merchants in China not because they had a good product but because they had learned how to do business with the Chinese much better than their competitors, the Americans and the British. The Americans simply are not good businessmen in China and the British, well, they are even worse than the Americans. "What is the problem, as I see it, with the Americans and the British? Well, they are just too honest, too sincere, too naive when it comes to China. Maybe their China watchers and academic writers have misprepared them. The French never had that problem, never fell into that category. And so before they headed to the negotiation table they knew exactly what our position and our arguments would be. "So in the Citic building the final negotiation phase was not very meaningful except in technical terms. Aerospatiale still had to explain to the customer how to interface their product with other products, system coordination and system integration and so on, because we would be putting on board the Dolphins some materials made in China. Part of the avionics are from China, for example. So the French did spend a lot of time explaining things like that to us, but that is hardly negotiating. "Sometimes during the talks I looked up at the face of my section director or the deputy manager or even at the general manager of the company. Most of the time they were somber and tight lipped. When they altered their expression and smiled, they smiled like robot might smile. They'd lost the color in their faces and it seemed they lacked any genuine emotion they had neither enthusiasm or sincerity. They smiled when they needed to smile. They laughed when they were supposed to laugh. They exchanged greetings when it was absolutely required. They controlled themselves at the meetings, I thought, beautifully, considering what was going on outside in the street and in the square. "Inside our comfortable air conditioned offices on the fifth floor of the Citic building which is commonly referred to in Beijing as the "Chocolate Building" because of its rich brown color it might appear that nothing of consequence was going on outside. It was incredible. None of us were in the mood to do business. Yet everyone smiled dutifully. I didn't know what was going to happen. I certainly thought this was the worst time imaginable to be doing arms dealing for the PLA. Like most other employees of Poly and as well as the employees of other companies in the Citic building, I wanted to be in the Square or in one of those massive parades that passed by on Jianguomen Avenue. But I was needed to examine and translate technical specifications from English into Chinese. So every day I did my job. I sat through the droning negotiations and the discussions of so many American dollars dollars are the currency used in the international arms trade for this and so many technicians to be trained here or there at this time or that. And whenever there was a lapse in the conversation I just gazed down at the table, thinking about what was happening outside, forgetting for the moment what was happening tuning out the voices in the room. My mind as well as my heart wandered again and again to the students and the workers the streets and the square. "I kept thinking, wondering what the solution to this crisis this uprising might be and what it might mean for the Communist party. I imagined on some days that it might be the end of the Communist party in China. Deng and the party might be actually be finished! And so I had almost convinced myself at the end of May that the Communist party of China was about to make its last gasp it had outlived its usefulness. I suppose the mood of those crowds at night in the intersections and the songs and cheers of the students in the street had affected me and I was thinking, like so many other Chinese at the time, with my heart rather than with my mind. I should have known better. I should have known better! "Since the intersections were blocked at night, it was difficult for me to get home after work. I had to ride my bicycle slowly around the city and walk part of the way. Some evenings I chose to stay in the office rather than go home, and on those nights I slept on a standby bed. Those among the French delegation who were staying at the Beijing Hotel also found it difficult to get a ride back to their rooms and they were forced to walk since even taxis could not navigate that short distance at night. "During the morning of Monday, May 29th, when we were in the final stage of negotiation, we heard some unusually loud noise from just outside in the hallway. When we stepped outside to see what was happening, we found a group of employees from other companies who were sympathetic to the students. They had learned that the helicopters, circling over Tiananmen Square and then flying over our building were purchased and imported through Poly, they leaked this story out to the students, and a lot of employees then mixed with the students and stormed our offices. They came right into the offices and the hallways on the fifth floor and belligerently questioned and accused anyone they could find. The guards in the lobby had lost control and couldn't stop anyone from coming into the building at that time. The receptionists told us that several times groups of people rushed up to the reception desks and swore at them and threatened them. When they found us, the first thing one student shouted at me was, `WHAT KIND OF FUCKING COMPANY ARE YOU, ANYWAY?' I said nothing but simply stared back at him. He was shaking with anger. Others came out of the offices to see what was going on. And the demonstrators and protestors continued to shout at us. They denounced anyone they could find. When someone tried to walk away they would actually grab them and ask, `What kind of company are you? Do you know what you are doing? You are spending China's treasure, her hard earned foreign currency to buy shit like this, like these helicopters.'" "Many of us were embarrassed and we really didn't know what to say. We just didn't know what to say. We weren't afraid at those moments, but we were profoundly moved. For the first time we stopped to think about what we had been doing. We knew that the French had sold us the helicopters and that those same machines were indeed now flying over the students and that at that very moment we were doing business with Aerospatiale again and spending China's foreign currency for more weapons. What could I tell them? That we never thought the helicopters would be used against students? Would that answer have satisfied them? "The demonstrators made a lot of noise and threw paper on the floor, but that was all. I'm sure they never knew that we were not unsympathetic toward them. "During the first three days of June things were getting out of hand in the office. Employees from other companies in the Citic building and other groups of people including students and their supporters just came in off the streets, marched into the offices of Poly and tried to cause trouble. The security guards assigned to the lobby seldom showed up anymore and the whole building was virtually unguarded. Anyone could walk in. And they did. "Some employees of other companies in the building changed their attitudes toward us, too. There were several international companies in the building, including American, Yugoslavian and West German and a couple of Chinese business, also. And now the topic of conversation among those employees was our company. When we were approached on the elevator or in the lobby they would say things such as, "We always wondered what kind of company you were. In the past we didn't know that. But now we know what you guys are doing. And it stinks!" I personally experienced that sort of exchange several times. Whenever the elevator door opened onto the fifth floor those inside glared at us or talked about the company loudly, firing out profane epithets as though we weren't really there. They said the meanest things about us things that were true. And they glared at us with accusatory and disapproving looks and tried to stare us down. At other times when we were on an elevator with them they would be absolutely quiet and refuse to exchange a simple perfunctory greeting or even to acknowledge our presence. We had become pariahs in our own office building. "The company officers immediately reported these incidents to the General Staff of the PLA of course and the General Staff made a decision. Later that summer, after the massacre, Poly was moved from the fifth floor of the Citic building to the seventeenth. "Judging from my talks with one of the French delegation members I learned that they were not unimpressed by what was happening in the streets during the talks. They could see and hear; they were watching, too. But they cherished one thing, above all else. They believed that no matter what seemed to be happening at the moment, in the end the Chinese government was going to control the situation. Nobody is going to change the course of communism in China, they believed. Not the students in the Square and not the workers in the streets. They believed that those in power would remain in power. And, besides, even if they proved to be wrong and Communism collapsed, no matter who stayed in power or came to power was going to need a strong army to control China. And the only way of way of arming the military with modern weapons was through foreign assistance. They were very confident of that. So there would always be a need for Aerospatiale, no matter who ruled China. "So the French were confident of themselves and of the government in Beijing. And when I saw them each morning, after they'd walked or ridden to the Citic building, I noticed that the expressions they had and their attitude was not that of the other foreigners wandering around Beijing at that time. Foreigners on the street, I thought, were sort of nervous and in a state of heightened excitement. They were looking around and with good reason to see who might be following them. But not the French. Never the French. "That is why, in the end, the signature itself on the Aerospatiale Poly Technologies contract was more significant as a matter of timing rather than of actual substance of the agreement. The French wanted to demonstrate that they could do business, make deals and come to agreements and sign contracts, and give out favors, even in the most chaotic of times. "Despite the difficulties and interruptions, on June 2nd everything in the Aerospatiale agreement was in place. The French had not budged on price, we had conceded everything and we were ready to make the purchase and to sign the contracts. The signing ceremony was arranged for the next day, June 3, a Saturday. On June 3rd, a massive crowd of demonstrators marched by and there was virtually no public transportation and no policemen in the streets. Everything seemed to be spinning out of control everything but our negotiations with the Aerospatiale. The completed contract between Aerospatiale and Poly Technologies arranged for the sale of four Dolphin helicopters for $US45 million. The contract called for two of the helicopters to be equipped with advanced avionics systems provided by a major subcontractor, Thomson CSF. The hardware and software package was to include S12 dipping sonar systems, acoustic signal processing capabilities, target display, fire control and an advanced C3I system. The helicopters were also to be capable of carrying anti submarine torpedoes. "I didn't finish work preparing documents for the signing ceremony until 2 o clock in the morning on June 3rd. The ceremony was postponed until 3 that afternoon. On the morning of June 3rd, there was a feeling in the company judging from the situation in the street and in the Square that time was rapidly running out. The principal officers of the company who were who were militarily well connected were no doubt aware of what the army had been ordered to do later that day. They knew! It was going to be close, they knew. They had to get business done and get out of the building and off the streets. As a result, they were concerned with wrapping up our business with the French as quickly as possible. At the same time they dare not communicate their grave concern to the French or to others of us in the company. They were unable to conceal their anxiety, however, but at the same time could not tell us why they were so rushed. The atmosphere in those final hours on Saturday, consequently, was one of intense yet unspecified foreboding. There was something ominous in the air. The Poly executives and the naval officers wanted to get the contract signed and complete the deal before the killing began that night. "Student marchers had come by our building almost daily. And then on June 2 and June 3 it seemed that everyone in the city was in the streets and I watched the biggest crowds I had ever seen before in and around Tiananmen. At least one million people poured out into the streets on those days. "As those crowds gathered outside, I prepared many of the final documents for signing. During the night of June 2nd and the early morning of the 3rd, we printed them out and laid them out for the signing ceremony. All of them had to be translated into English, which is the lingua franca of the arms trade. "That morning the building looked almost abandoned, like a ghost building. The security guards did not show up for work indeed, hadn't been there for several days and workers in most of the other offices were also not at their desks that Saturday. In fact, not all of our Chinese staff showed up that morning because they simply couldn't make it to the office. Kunming, of course, had run to work, and all of the major officers were present for the signing. "The French arrived at 3 pm they had walked to our office because no taxis were available and we showed them to a room with a long table which we had draped the national flags of France and China. Our front desk receptionists, two pretty young girls, were recruited to serve champagne, which was a must for an occasion like this. "He Ping, Mr. Samuel and Xie Tie Niu stood side by side and smiled for our photographer. Yet this was an unusually solemn ceremony since every one of us even the French knew what was happening outside. Everyone was somber and unsmiling unless it was absolutely required to appear otherwise. When we made a toast and said "Gen Bei" then people would flash a smile for a moment, but it was forced, and it was over in a moment. "And when we were finished, when I saw the contract signing, all I could think of at that time was that I really hated the French, from the depth of my soul I hated them. I had nothing but complete contempt for them. The French, my God. How could anyone respect for them. I'll never have a friendship with them again, never in my life. I'll never speak to them again. They are filthy. "At five o clock the signing ceremony was completed. Then there was an unexpected request. The French expected that as usual following such momentous events, there would be a banquet to celebrate the completed agreement. They asked He Ping where the banquet was to be. "The French usually preferred to celebrate at Maxim's, an elegant and expensive French restaurant, for their signing banquets. Most of us at Poly, though, never liked the place because we found French cooking to be nearly inedible. But this was an unusual night and Maxim's was far away and would require driving. And when they suggested a banquet, He Ping immediately suggested that we hold it right in the building, on the 28th floor, at the Windows of the World(Shi Jie Zhi Chuang) a superb Chinese restaurant many people insist that it is the best Chinese restaurant in Beijing. The French insisted that they pay for the banquet on this evening, so He Ping telephoned the manager of the restaurant and reserved tables for 30 people. "There are A and B and C levels of banquets at the Windows of the World, and since the French were paying and price was therefore not an issue, He Ping ordered the A banquet. Everyone present at the signing ceremony, including the receptionists, was invited to attend. Since this was very short notice, and it was already late about 6:30 pm the banquet was not as formal as such affairs usually are. There was merely a brief rest period and then we took the elevators to the top of the building. We even called the girls at the front desk and the drivers, and reserved two tables for them in the restaurant. "Our party that night occupied only about five tables but we asked that the restaurant be illuminated by candlelight for this special celebration. The manager complied with our request and glass shaded candles were placed on the tables while the overhead lights were dimmed. I noticed that the there were few waitresses in the restaurant that night. We were told by the manager that many of his workers were unable to get through the streets to work. The service was consequently agonizingly slow and for a group of people in a hurry, this was unfortunate. He Ping wished to complete the banquet as quickly as possible and at the same time not appear discourteous to the French hosts. "Shark fin soup, the specialty of the restaurant was served as the opening course, and was accompanied by a dozen bottles of the finest French champagne available. While we waited for each course that evening, there were scores of toasts and the champagne was quickly consumed. There was plenty of time to talk between the courses and the toasts. And more time to worry, actually. "From the Windows of the World we could see out over the entire city. There were few other guests in the restaurant that evening, obviously because it was difficult to travel outside and very few of Beijing's businessmen were in a festive mood. "The dignitaries from the negotiating sessions Kunming, Tie Niu, He Ping, Bo Ying, Samuels and others of high rank sat at a head table. They appeared to be involved in serious conversation during their eating and drinking. "As the sky darkened outside, some of us looked out the windows toward the illumination in the distance that we knew was Tiananmen Square. We couldn't resist it, of course. Those of us from Poly talked among ourselves about events outside. After all, we could still speak freely about whatever we liked. The French representatives at my table, who had to communicate with us through a translator, wanted to know what we thought was going to happen in China in the coming weeks and years. But they were polite enough not to ask pointed questions and not to press for answers. Some French representatives indicated, during the dinner, that they were actually more pleased with the negotiating process itself at this critical and pivotal moment in China's history than with the actual specifics of the contract. It indicated, they said, that the Chinese and the French could do business under even the most harrowing of circumstances. I recall, in particular, one individual stating that they had been successful in breaking through the `Chinese ice' in the past several days and sealing an important business deal. It proved, he said, that the events in the streets need not intrude into the talk of the negotiating room. "The Chinese around the table shared their worries and concerns, predicting what might happen and what the future might be like. Of course, we were wrong in our predictions. "We didn't say out loud what we all knew that the Communist regime was basically against the will of the people. All you had to do was to look at the numbers of people in the streets. You saw the banners and the slogans every day. Everything looked white in the streets from the shirts and the banners of the marchers. And along the sides of the streets were small camps for university students from other provinces. They could not get into Tiananmen Square because the Square was restricted to students, primarily, from the Beijing area. Sometimes they slept in buses that never left their parking places. Some stood on top of the buses during the demonstrations waving flags. And they stood around the army trucks that made it into the city and tried to talk to the soldiers, who were stranded in the middle of this restless sea of people and who were obviously frustrated and unhappy and in no mood to talk to anybody. "One of the officials of our company, I recall, asked, `Why should I be worried? If the Party is finished, then half the people will be very happy. And if the party is not finished, another half of the people will be happy.' `And if China is to be more democratic,' another asserted, `then there will be perhaps a better life for all.' That is what we dwelled on the impending death of either the democracy movement or of the Communist party. Everybody could not win. One side or the other would have to triumph and the other back off in defeat. "Out of politeness, we turned again and again to small talk and asked the French, through our translator, how they enjoyed their stay in China and what monuments and tourist attractions they had visited and enjoyed most. We tried to avoid politics with them despite their persistent questions. But, with each other, we shared our concerns, because we all could see what was happening. "He Ping and Mr. Samuel made their final toasts at 10:30. I noticed He Ping looking at his watch with some concern as the night wore on. When he had completed his toast, the banquet was finished and we prepared to leave. "A few minutes later we were on the elevators returning to our fifth floor offices. The French guests and a few of the Poly Technologies officers went down first and the rest of us followed in shifts on the small elevators. We stopped for Frenchmen to retrieve some of their papers and cases on the fifth floor and then escorted them to the lobby. I noticed that there were cars from the French Embassy waiting for them in front of the Citic building. I thought this was unusual. They were then driven away in the direction of the French Embassy rather than toward their hotels. I thought later that this perhaps indicated that they had some idea of what was going to happen. As I watched them leave, I thought just for a moment that I detected lightening flashes in the western sky and guessed that it was going to rain and that I should hurry home. "As I then walked to retrieve my bicycle from behind the Chocolate building, I saw Kunming almost silently come out into the dark street in his running shorts and sneakers and pad off into the darkness. Other employees of the company scattered in several different directions heading home. There were no taxis or cars moving about and so very little noise in the street at that time. "As I rode my bicycle home, in a general northwest direction, I noticed that the situation on the street was still tense. I passed many military vehicles parked along the side streets, loaded with silent soldiers. Yet, curiously, nobody seemed too worried about them and nobody I talked to thought they would shoot anybody. When you saw the trucks driving around during the day you weren't afraid because the general feeling was that the PLA might do something dramatic but certainly they would never shoot anybody, not indiscriminantly, certainly. I think the general anxiety came from the belief that something had to change, something had to give, and nobody knew what. But I must say now that the silent trucks sitting there in the dark were not a good sign. The soldiers inside were so quiet, they weren't even talking to each other. Some of them were stranded and some of them were lost, we thought. And all of them seemed, when you saw them in the light, unhappy to be in Beijing. "As I made my way home I found that there was some traffic on the street, but the main intersections remained blocked with buses and taxis and concrete dividers. "I took a roundabout way home. Despite my long day and staying up most of the previous night, I wasn't very tired. I rode around Beihai park. "Crowds of people were gathered throughout the area. They were talking, smoking, laughing. Predicting the future. Sometimes there were only a dozen or so gathered, sometimes more. They would be standing in a circle, arguing or listening to someone speaking. Some insisted that Communism was finished. And nobody believed that army was going to shoot anybody. I even stopped my bicycle and listened for a time to one of the more animated discussions in the street. There was a sizable crowd of people there and an army veteran was addressing them. I remember so clearly hearing him say, "The army may shoot, but they will only shoot in the air if they do. Don't forget, it is the People's liberation army and they will only shoot into the air, they will never shoot the people." "I wanted to believe him. But he was wrong. Within a very short time, of course, the People's Liberation Army moved in and they shot anyone and everyone. "I was getting ready for bed when I heard what sounded like firecrackers going off in the distance, near Mu Xudi. The noise continued and grew louder. I looked outside into the sky and saw searchlights scanning the darkness. I decided to bicycle toward Mu Xudi to see what was happening. As I approached the intersection it looked like a huge fire was burning in the distance. The sky was glowing red and there were constant flashes of what appeared to be lightning. Then people ran by me in the darkness, some of them cursing, some crying, some just silently running away. I got off my bicycle and wheeled it beside me toward Mu Xudi. And as I got closer and closer I found myself whispering over and over and over again, `Oh, no. Oh, no. Oh, no.' "Most of us from Poly Technologies were unable to get back to work for a week after that. So the timing of the contract signing turned out to be even more fortuitous for the French, it seemed at first. On June 4th soldiers came by and shot at the windows on the 27th floor of the Citic building. That floor was occupied by a Yugoslavian industrial engineering firm called SNELT Global Project Management and by AT&T. Some of the office windows faced west toward Tiananmen Square and from those windows you could see clearly what was happening in the streets. Some of the soldiers insisted later that they saw snipers in the windows. What really happened, though, was that the public security officers saw some videotapes they thought must have been taken from the 27th floor of the building and they wanted to intimidate people and prevent them from taking any pictures of what was happening from that advantageous position on the 27th floor. Later on the soldiers shot out not only the windows of our building but also some of those in the nearby foreign residential area and the diplomatic compounds. The offices of the British and the American army attaches, with the windows facing the west, were all shot out, too. The soldiers said later that they thought films were being made from those buildings, too. "Yet within a surprisingly short time, business was back to normal at Poly. And on the surface everything looked as it had a few months before the massacre. But very few of us felt the same inside. We saw what had happened and many of us had not supported the action of the army or of the military. Yet nobody dared to speak out about it anymore. Nobody dared to express his own opinion openly any longer. The atmosphere in the city and in the company had changed dramatically. We felt it was dangerous to speak critically about the government or the PLA. So we stuck to business. Poly Technologies was still in business and arms deals had to be made. "But what was interesting about that Aerospatiale contract was that later on, because of the Tiananmen incident, the French government joined the American government in imposing certain restricted economic sanctions against China and consequently the contract failed to get approval of the French government. So the system was never delivered and the contract not finalized. French Aerospatiale worked closely with DCN to persuade the French government to approve the contract. Of course, since high technology transfers and military technology were involved, the French government had no other choice but to not reject the contract for the time being. But in time, naturally, it was approved because, well, you know the French. Business is business and politics is politics. "For several days after June 3rd, it was difficult for many employees of companies in the Citic building to get to work. Public transportation had come to a complete standstill. But when it was possible to get to work and the offices in the building were again operating, almost invariably, the employees of the other companies still spoke openly about what had happened. And many of them became really infuriated about Poly Technologies. They not only had seen the helicopters and they knew that we had purchased them. On June 4th, Soviet made MI 8 transport helicopter flew overhead towing a large aerial speaker and broadcasting, `Jun Wei shou zhang zhi shi: Bu dui bu de shou zu. Shou zu jian jue huan ji.'(Instructions from the Central Military Commission troops should by no means be stopped from advancing. If they are, open fire.)" And down there in the street, an APC captured by some workers and students opened fire on the helicopter with the anti aircraft machine gun, forcing the aircraft to accelerate quickly and climb away to a safer altitude to avoid being hit. "The discussions in the lobby and in the hallways kept coming back again and again to Poly Technologies. And then the harassment started all over again. People on the elevators said that `Poly is in this building, and these fucking guys have nothing to do with us. They are under no one's control.' And several times these people would sort of wander into the reception area of our offices and question the girls there, who didn't really know what was going on. They sometimes spilled ink or papers and then shouted insults. Whenever an officer came out of the office they stopped him and cursed him. They were a continuing nuisance and they were embarrassing. "And so we moved from the 5th to the 17th floor of the Citic building. We had been planning this move for sometime, since we needed more office space. And the events surrounding the Tiananmen massacre, the harassment by others in the building, simply hastened the move. It was like Chinese politics. Anything that happens in Chinese politics is never based solely on one thing. There are usually many factors contributing to the final result. Harassment by other employees in the Citic building was merely one of the elements an important one, to be sure that caused our move up in the world. II THE WOMAN WHO LOVED ADMIRALS "I first came across the unusual influence of the French arms industry behind the scenes in China, ironically, during negotiations with a British Aerospace for the purchase of the Lynx ASW (Anti Submarine Warfare) Helicopter. That was in 1986. Now this should have been a standard business deal with the British. Yet, in the end we didn't purchase the Lynx, even though it was a much better system than the one that we purchased from the French. This was really a stupid mistake on the part of the Chinese military. "We were shopping around at the time the end of 1985 for a specific sort of shipborne ASW helicopter. At that time, we had no shipborne helicopter capabilities at all. So the British representatives came to Beijing and we arranged for them to stay in a hotel near the Citic building. And then suddenly, out of nowhere, the French approached us with their ASW system, and so arrangements were made for them to stay in another hotel in Beijing. We then began negotiations in earnest with both groups, examining what they had in the way of ASW helicopters. "The British Naval Attache in Beijing, Commander Farr, was involved directly in these negotiations with us, indicating how important this was to the British. Each side, moreover, was represented by a large delegation there were about a dozen people in each of the two delegations. Anything more than ten to us was a big delegation. Each group included expert for sonar, one for ASW torpedoes, one for avionics and so on. And each would make a presentation and run through the technical aspects of their particular system. Sometimes slides and videotapes were presented showing actually tests of a system. Each of the delegations had seven business days to present their ASW systems to us. Each morning we went to the meeting room of the hotel and stayed usually until the evening. Each night there was a banquet, of course. "On our side were representatives of the Army, Navy and the Air Force, all, naturally, in civilian dress. I recall that during the presentations, which were necessarily very technical, there was never any mention of price or of money, but there was a lot of talk about us being 'old friends' and 'the friendship between the two countries' and so on. The actual price surfaced only at the end of the final seminar. Before you quote a price you have to show us how far advanced your system is and why it would be worth the price you quote in the end. "Now the British at this time knew that the French were conducting simultaneous negotiations with us. They did not like it, but there was absolutely nothing they could do about it. "And they confided to us privately that they were not happy with the situation. Sometimes the members of the delegations would run into each other while drinking late at night in one of the hotels. Mr. Adam Williams, British GEC Marconi Group's representative to China once boasted how small the world could be for him to know more people from across the English Channel in China than he did in Britain. "I had familiarized myself with the specific technological terminology of the ASW system before negotiations began, and I believe I understood the specific merits and quality of the British and the French systems. Westland was the builder of the Lynx helicopter frame, but the avionics system, which is what we were really looking for, the airborne torpedo system, the night imaging system, sonar and sonar buoys, and this sort of thing, along with the MAD system(Magnetic Abnormality Detection), was subcontracted. "In the closing session of the seminar with the British they gave us their price they asked for a little more than $100 million for one completely ASW equipped Lynx. That was is called a non recurring price. If we purchased two then the price went down. This was a lot of money to us. "What we wanted to do was to buy the ASW technology and then duplicate and reverse manufacture it. The foreign businessmen of course are not that stupid and so they understand this. And so the technology always costs a lot more than the hardware. Sometimes, they required, as part of a deal, to buy more than one unit of a product in order to maximize further their profit. "The French price was comparable to the British but with one important difference. The French quoted their price in Swiss francs and the British gave their price quotation in pounds Sterling. This was to be a clever move by the French, in the end. "After the two offers were made, our top experts and technicians from the negotiating sessions met to discuss the two systems several times and they came away absolutely convinced that the Lynx system was by far the best one for us and that it was exactly what we were looking for. "So at Poly we were all mentally prepared to buy the Lynx system from British Aerospace. In fact, we indicated to the British specifically that `this time you guys have a deal' and they were quite pleased with the news. It was, to us, simply unthinkable at that time that we would buy the French system rather than the British. But, it turned out, as it so often does in China, that the unthinkable suddenly became the reality. The reason for this was simple bribery. "Now the reason why the French were able to make a deal with us on the ASW system and the British were not is because the French were more clever and more venal than the British. The French were also very good businessmen. The British were good businessmen, too. But the difference is that the British were business gentlemen and the French were not. "The British had a great system, but they were neither clever enough nor dishonest enough to sell us that system. They were always forthright, honest and well informed and totally above the table in their dealings. Because of that, at Poly, we liked working with them. Basically, their attitude was, what you see is what you get. But they just didn't know how to make a deal with China. Their honesty was both their greatest strength and their greatest weakness in China. This is too often true with the Americans also. "The French, in their dealings with China, are seldom troubled by honesty. They knew full well, of course, that their system was not as advanced as the British. But they understood not only the ASW system, they understood the Chinese governmental and business system, too. And at the same time they approached us they privately approached our fleet admirals and they approached our top ranking officers of the General Staff as well as of the Navy. "They brought with them from France many very expensive gifts for influential military leaders in China. These were delivered as negotiations began. At that time the admiral in charge of this specific operation in the Chinese Navy was the Chief of the Naval Fleet Air Arm, Li Jing, who is today a Lt. Admiral. Since the helicopters purchased by Poly were to be used by the Navy, so the Navy had a final say in the negotiations and the purchase. In a sense, we at Poly were their agent in this deal. "Admiral Li initially received from the French a small copper model of the Dolphin helicopter for his desk. It was a beautiful piece of precision work. There were many other gifts delivered to him also by the French, but I did not see them unwrapped nor did I ever see them in the office. I only saw them delivered and signed for. "What was most important in this deal was that the Admiral received a very special three page letter from the French. The first page of the letter stated quite officially that "we are looking forward to successful dealings with the Chinese Navy and we hope that all will work out well between us." Nothing more than that, of course. And attached to that page was a second page. The second page, was a bank draft a certificate of deposit, actually for $US300,000 in a numbered Swiss bank account in Zurich. This was only one of many such drafts I was to see while working for Poly. I remember the amount of this draft because it was the largest personal draft I'd ever seen. "The third page of this letter was an official notification of admission to a French university for the Admiral's son. The notification also included a full four year scholarship and asserted that following an evaluation of his academic record and of his tests, the scholarship was awarded because of the admiral's son's expertise in the French language. Now I knew the admiral's son and had met him several times. He was in his final year of undergraduate college study in Beijing and he spoke not a single word of French nor had he ever taken a French language course. "You see, the French knew exactly how the Chinese system worked. The admiral had power to influence the decision on the ASW helicopters and so Aerospatiale went after him. And what did the British offer him perhaps two or three dinners. "How did Aerospatiale know about Admiral Li's role in the decision making process and about his son in his final year of middle school? They had employed at a very good salary two consultants go betweens or facilitators in China, whose business in was to find out just such things who should be treated with special care and special favor. This couple was constantly researching military needs and family connections in China so that Aerospatiale could more easily facilitate out its desired transactions. "I knew this couple only as Mr. and Mrs. Wang. They wield considerable invisible power in arms dealing transactions in China. They had been first employed by Aerospatiale in 1982. They had both worked prior to that time in the same unit the Signal Corps of the PLA. This had been an independent organization that had been incorporated recently into the General Staff. Today it is a department of the General Staff. "Before he retired from the Signal Corps, Mr. Wang had been promoted to the rank of regimental commander. He was, however, not happy with this rank and he wanted to be promoted further. But the chance of that was not good. So, he considered retiring from the Signal Corps, but was not permitted to do so. "The Signal Corps had in the past made some of our first deals with the French and so Mr. Li had experience in dealing with Aerospatiale from the Chinese side. He negotiated not only with the French but with the British also, especially when it came to the purchase of communications equipment, his specialty. He was, in fact, almost continuously involved in technical discussions and evaluations. His understanding of communications and technology, it was said, was one of the best in the PLA. "In his negotiations, Aerospatiale was a regular party on the other side of the table. They came to see Mr. Wang as the central figure in the decision making process on the Chinese side. They found that not only was he well situated in the military, but also that he was also from a well connected family. Such a man, they guessed quite correctly, might be very valuable to them. "And so, over the course of many months, the French recruited Mr. Wang to work for them. We were not at all aware of this until all of a sudden Mr. Li became very interested in learning more about the French. He and his wife learned to speak French. Again they asked to be retired from the military, and this time their request was granted. In 1983 they decided to work for the French in Beijing. They were in an advantageous position. They knew exactly what kinds of equipment the military was looking for and because of their family connections, they had inside information concerning the military budget. This was very valuable and critical information. Mr. Wang was willing to provide all of this inside information to the French, for a price. "The French offered them consulting positions. Mr. Wang and his wife were invited to travel to France in order to examine the business and manufacturing facilities of Aerospatiale and to gain first hand experience with the company. They obtained their passports and visas and flew to Paris. They remained in France for more than a year. During their stay, their son and daughter joined them and were quickly admitted to French universities. The children still today are there. "Then, in 1985, just before China held a defense exhibition show, what we call the Asiandex Mr. Wang and his wife moved back to Beijing. They moved into an apartment, rather than a hotel, which they could easily afford, in order to emphasize that they were still Chinese citizens. They maintained a permanent office, however, at the Beijing Hotel. But everyone knew that they were now very heavily committed now to the French and promoting deals for the French. "I'd heard about their new role in 1985, just before I met them for the first time in 1986. By that time, everyone at Poly Technologies knew Mr. and Mrs. Wang. And whenever a new employee came into the company, he or she was immediately introduced to the Wangs. Everyone had to know him. "During the 1987 Defense Exposition held in the China International Exhibition Center, Mr. and Mrs. Wang were always busy touring the French exhibition stands. He also introduced the Chinese and the French vips to each other and discussed the merits of some of the systems on display. And whenever the generals from the air force or the admirals from the Navy came, the Wangs were by their side constantly. "On a couple of occasions when I accompanied Admiral Li and other high ranking military officers, he enthusiastically escorted us around the exhibition center. He was always eager to entertain us and was always asking, `Oh, and where is the admiral going later?' "The first evening we met him at the exhibition, he kept glancing anxiously at his watch and asking about our plans. And the personal assistant to the admiral finally confessed, `Well, we have no where to go and we don't know where they will eat.' So Mr. Wang invited us out for dinner and took us to the Great Wall Hotel, which is near the Exhibition Center. There we had a very nice and expensive dinner. And it seemed in the days following this first meeting, Mr. Wang was regularly inviting us out for lunch and dinner and it was always very expensive and it was always his treat. "After dinner, Mr. Wang smoked some very nice Chinese cigarettes, his favorite brand was Red Pagoda Mountain, Hong Tashan. I think he did it just for show purposes. He just sat side by side with the admirals and with the generals when they were present, and by his smoking he seemed to advertise, `You see, I'm still patriotic. I refuse to smoke foreign imported cigarettes, even though I can afford them. These are the ones I prefer, despite the fact that I stay in France and I work for the French.' If he had a lot of money, and I believe that he did, then he made a point of never showing it off. The cigarettes were a case in point. Whenever he smoked, he smoked maybe half an inch from the cigarette, just the end, and then put it out. He was a chain smoker, but only smoked the tip of the of the cigarettes. And he always picked up the tab. Whenever we dined with Mr. Wang, he spent most of the time we were together discussing family matters children, wives, relatives and so on. His wife listened intently and usually added little to the conversation. She was a much better listener than talker, and I am sure she tried always to pick up on private family matters and later made a note of them for future reference. Mr. Wang, also, learned a great deal, always, about family members of the military officers and their private wishes and desires. At the end of a meal there was always a series of toasts to the family. "And finally, just before dinner ended, or at least near the end, then Mr. Wang would suddenly bring up business. And he would say, in a smooth tone of voice, something like, `All right, this time the French have this or that for you,' and then his semi formal presentations were quite detailed and very convincing. Sometimes it was strange to listen to. He would talk about his children and then in the same breath bring up the fact that the French had superb, the thermal imaging system, and so on. And he said, `I just spoke with them and they will reduce the price for you, they are making a point of it. This is an excellent deal. You should not pass it up.' The admirals and the generals of course were not well educated and not really well informed in these matters they depended for their information on others, and often, they depended on Mr. Wang. Once they heard his pitch, they were inevitably interested. "They usually responded enthusiastically, asking many questions about the details of the proposed deal and the details of the system itself. They also confided in Mr. Wang and treated him as though he were acting as an agent of the Chinese military which he was not. "'Make sure,' they would tell him. `Don't let them charge us an unfavorable price. You are the guy who knows the bottom line. So don't deceive us. Get us a good deal.' And Mr. Wang then did. "Mr. Wang or his wife would always respond, `Oh, you can count on us. We are all from one big family. Of course we trust each other.' And then, smiling and walking away from the dining room while poking a toothpick around in his mouth, the Admiral signaled to his personal secretary to make a report about the deal and to bring it to his office in the morning. "But of course I knew exactly what they were doing. Every time Mr. Wang opened his mouth he was drumming up business for the French, reciting the French line. My God, if he wasn't unusually valuable to the French, they would never pay him the way they did. "Mr. Wang was well positioned to do business. He knew where the weak points of the French were and where the weak points of the Chinese were. That was the key to his success. He knew what the military had to spend, what the French could or could not charge, and who had children that might like to attend a French university. "When he spoke with me he was outgoing and flattering. I talked to him often about business. I was quite surprised. He seemed to know Poly Technologies inside out and he knew personal things about all of the top guys in the company. "I once asked one of Admiral Li's staff officers about Mr. Wang and he said, `Mr. Wang is very helpful. He travels back and forth to France all the time. Then whenever there is business to be done, he is here. He has French citizenship and he is a permanent resident of France and his children are there.' "Now, in the competition between the Lynx and the Dolphin, the French positioned themselves perfectly when they quoted their price in Swiss francs. They were told that the price quotations were similar. But they let it be known, through Mr. Wang, that they would give a `very favorable' exchange rate on the Swiss francs so that in fact their price would be much lower than that quoted by the British. Mr. Wang conveyed that news to us. Still, however, the British system, we felt, was far superior to the French and was well worth the price differential. "After making their presentations and giving their prices, the French and the British waited around Beijing waiting for a decision to be made. A group of Chinese dignitaries and military personnel from the general staff, including the equipment department, made a special trip to visit the facilities of Aerospatiale in France. I did not accompany them on that trip. "The head of the delegation flew, as usual, first class on a Air France jet. Although most of those who went were high ranking military officers, none of them wore uniforms. No one was to know that they were in the military, but the French knew. They stayed, naturally, in luxurious hotels in Paris, and each night they were escorted around the city to the cabarets and the night spots. Some of them flew down to the southern cities at that time to Toulon and Marseilles to see the French defense research facilities. They were supposed to make a survey of the manufacturing facilitates that would produce the Dolphin system. But this was just a symbolic trip, since everybody knew already that the deal was made. The officers from the department were convinced by individuals from the top, or bribed in one way or another, and once the top was in the bag, so to speak, then the deal was done. The trip to France was merely a junket on Aerospatiale. A nice bonus for the Chinese. These people came back and said later that they favored the Dolphin system and that they based their decision on their survey of the manufacturing firms. This is simply not true. They merely pretended that they were even more convinced than ever that the French had an advanced ASW system and this was exactly the thing that they were looking for. "And so one month after the three page letter was delivered to Admiral Li the decision was made concerning our next major purchase. Remember, in a country like China, one month is prompt. Those of us from Poly involved in the negotiations recommended purchase of the British Lynx system, but we were overruled. The French got the deal. We got the Dolphins. "The British of questioned us later about this, about not getting the deal. Of course they were very deeply concerned. And they cautioned us and said that the French didn't even use their Dolphin helicopters on board their own ships. China ended up as one of the very few countries in the world that actually used Dolphin helicopters for shipborne helicopter defenses. "The Rear Admiral in charge of the project was concerned and upset after this as to what had happened. He sent a letter to the Admiral and he approached the officers on the General Staff. But it was to no avail, of course. "As to the $300,000, Admiral Li would be unable to use this himself, but it was arranged so that his son and daughter in France might enjoy it. "The British expressed their dismay and disillusionment with us on several different occasions. I think they knew where Poly stood on these decisions. And they told me once, at a diplomatic gathering, `OK, what kind of a corrupt system do you guys have here? You just keep purchasing this god damned garbage from the French. Don't you know that these systems will never work in a real war situation?' "In fact, the answer to the question was a simple, yes, we did know that these systems would probably never work in "a real war situation." But the point is, that the system we purchased was probably never meant for a real war situation. Rather, it was intended as a business transaction with specific beneficiaries. And in that respect, it was very successful. "The National Security Ministry, in time, caught on to the bribery system that was practiced in military procurement, and sought to stop it. The individual they selected to interrupt the corrupt system was, unfortunately, a woman named Wang Jian Jiang. A top agent for the National Security Ministry, she was sent to the Navy at the end of 1987 to supervise the political and disciplinary matters concerning foreign affairs and procurement. Because of her special status with the National Security Ministry she had to spend a lot of time in the central command compound of the Navy. She, allegedly, should have cured the problems of foreign arms corporations, including the French, from taking advantage of the familial concerns of the officers that made them so susceptible to bribery. But things went awry soon after she arrived and rather than cleaning up the system, she became a central part of it. "Within a very short time, Wang Jiang Jian had not only made contact with several of the top admirals in the PLA navy, she had in fact forged intimate contacts with them. Secret liaisons with the officers were made easy for her because she lived in a private suite in the Purple Jade (Ziyu)Hotel in the western suburbs of Beijing not far from the headquarters of the Navy. This provided her with privacy, convenience and freedom to do what she wished in the hotel. "Miss Wang, an unusually and naturally well endowed woman who was described by young naval officers as `attractive in two ways,' had recently divorced her husband, who was a section chief a in the National Security Ministry. She maintained custody of the couple's only child, a daughter. Miss Wang and her husband had divorced, it was said, because of her many extra marital affairs. She continued her romantic aggressiveness when she began supervising Naval affairs. To officers both old and young at the Naval compound, she was always warm, friendly and radiating. And soon after she arrived at the Naval compound she fell in love with many of the officers. Among her many lovers in the Navy was the Captain Xie Tie Niu(Iron Ox). In time, her affairs with Naval officers caused difficulty. She began to pressure Captain Xie to divorce his wife in order to marry her. This was a problem since Captain Xie he was not that serious about Miss Wang. But she could cause him trouble by widely publicizing his extra marital dalliances. So he made a deal, authorized by the admirals at the compound. "Directly under Captain Xie was a naval commander named Zhang Lu ting. He was a prominent individual in the Navy and an heir apparent to the section chief's position. The commander was handsome, had a good Naval background, and most important, was single. So Captain Xie made a deal with him, telling him `If you want to succeed me as section chief, you must marry this woman!' Of course, he did not like Miss Wang, but, he had few choices at the time and there was a lot of pressure on him. If he wanted a promotion he would have to marry her. Miss Wang, on the other hand, was very happy with the prospect of this handsome and relatively naive young officer as her husband. This was the sort of prey she was looking for, and she approved of the arrangement. "The problem was now with the young officers. When he told his mother about the arrangement, (his father, a prominent figure in the Navy, had passed away earlier), she was outraged. She personally knew of Miss Wang's practices and reputation. So Commander Zhang's mother personally came to the naval compound to question the admirals. `What in the hell are you trying to do to my son?' she shouted at one of them in the hallway. Her protests were overheard by many officers working nearby. She returned to the compound many times and always stayed for several hours and demanded to see the Admirals. She would not leave when asked to. She pressured whomever she could find. But Captain Xie would not bend in his decision and he said to his fellow officers, `The deal has been made.' But he told others, including Commander Zhang's mother that this was not a deal and that Zhang and Wang were really in love. "So the young officer was the only one to suffer from all of this. He was disowned by his family. But he did marry Miss Wang and all of the important admirals who had been lover of Miss Wang attended the ceremony. "Of course, later on, Commander Zhang got his promotion to captain and succeeded Captain Xie. And Miss Wang, now Mrs. Zhang, of course, maintained her hotel room and continued her former ways. She and her husband lived in a suite in the Purple Jade hotel. But for National Security Ministry purposes she also maintained four other specially designated rooms. Now, however, in addition to romantic affairs with high ranking naval officers, she also began having affairs with foreign clients in Beijing to do business with Poly Technologies and the Navy. French and English businessmen in Beijing sometimes stayed at the Purple Jade Hotel for a few nights in order to be near the Naval compound. And in the course of their business, if they were at all attractive, they were sure to be introduced to Mrs. Zhang. It became known that any foreigner hoping to make a deal with the PLA Navy through Poly Technologies, had better satisfy Mrs. Zhang If she was not satisfied, there might be difficulties in negotiations later. "This created some anxiety, however, because Mrs. Zhang was rumored to be nearly sexually insatiable. She was never really happy with her young husband. She purchased strong potency medicines for her him and delivered them to the office. When he came to work each morning, he looked weary and haggard. The other young officers chided him half seriously. `No sleep last night, Captain Zhang?' they asked. `What's the problem? Anything I can do to help?' "Captain Zhang is today is head of the Office is the International Procurement of the PLA Navy. And Mrs. Zhang, as the wife of the officer in charge of procurement, has even more legitimate reasons than before for getting involved intimately in naval foreign affairs. Whenever there is a seminar or a banquet at which foreigners are involved, she is always around, looking over the participants. But she not only supervises the political and diplomatic line of the business process, but is also committed to logistical matters of foreign related activity. "Now whenever there is a banquet or reception, when the festivities are finished, Captain Zhang and his wife invariably stay behind to help settle out the bills. And because of their responsibility to take charge of financial matters, they have been able to include into the reception bills items such as American cigarettes, expensive French wine and champagne, and western cosmetics. As an example, there is a medicine for cosmetic purposes that is made from pearls. It is extremely expensive in China. Yet, on a couple of occasions, the purchase of these pearl cosmetics was simply included as a functional expense of the reception activities and Captain Zhang and his wife were compensated for these items by the Navy. "On several occasions, other young naval officers watched, when a banquet was finished, as Captain and Mrs. Zhang left the restaurant through the back door, and headed to their own car with several large bags. Once at a reception at the Renewed Restaurant, which once served the Imperial family at Summer Palace, this occurred and a young officer curiously followed the Zhangs from the restaurant. He made a point of stopping them but as he was about to inquire as to what they were carrying in their bags, the Mrs. Zhang seemed to woman read his mind and in order to shut him up, opened a bag, and offered him two bottles of expensive Maotai Liquor the very best in China and five cartons of Kent cigarettes. She said impatiently, `Here, take it! This is something our friends brought us from Hong Kong!' She forgot that any Maotai liquor on sale in Hong Kong had a different trade mark from that sold in China. "As time passed, Mrs. Zhang's reputation among officers in the naval compound grew worse and worse. Finally, the disciplinary committee of the Navy intervened. Although it was a very difficult process because of her connections with some of the top admirals of the Navy, as well as the foreign affairs group, still the Navy managed to contact the National Security Ministry and very gracefully had Mrs. Zhang assigned back at that ministry. "Within the Navy there is a department called the Equipment Department. And under this department is a very powerful Political Division. In 1987, 1988 and 1989 the director of that division was Captain Wang Dan ya, who came from a very influential communist party family. He was promoted to the position at the age of 47, which was relatively young, for someone having a similar post in the Navy at that time. He and Captain Xie Tie niu, as well as the Rear Admiral Zheng Min, who was in charge of the entire department, were all interlocked in their personal relationships and their family background connections from outside the Navy. These three men were among the very few officers in the Navy who shared a common and influential civilian background. Because these three people held very important jobs concerning Naval foreign affairs. So, whenever there was an important decision to be made concerning Naval procurement policy, these three and Miss Zhang met together before any decision was made, officially. That is why they were referred to within the Navy ranks as `The Gang of Four'(Si Ren Bang). But unfortunately their honeymoon did not last very long. "Mr. Wang had a relative in Taiwan. And as China opened its doors to outsiders more and more Taiwanese poured into the mainland, Mr. Wang's nephew, who was in his early thirties, came to Beijing for a visit in the spring of 1989. Against all the rules and regulations of the military, he stayed in his uncle's family home. Then, almost as if it was a prearranged to look like an accident, the captain made a point of leaving some important Party and Navy documents on his desk at home when his nephew was there. The whole point of this seemed to be that he knew that the young man worked for Taiwanese military intelligence. But he didn't tell anyone else. And the purpose of making classified documents available to the young man was to try to generate some personal profits for himself. Therefore, these important documents were duly photographed and were taken by the young man, who almost made it out of the country with them before he was detained by agents from the National Security Ministry agents. The Ministry immediately recognized the nature of the documents, which concerned the Navy Strategy and Procurement and arms sales policies towards neighboring countries, the Soviet Union and the United States. These were long term strategy plans. So the National Security Ministry informed the Navy and asked the Navy to check the serial numbers of the documents, which were printed at the top of each document, to see who had handled them. And of course the first name that came up was Admiral Zhang himself. He was so angered by this, that he immediately summoned his two friends to his office and closed the door. He showed both Captain Wang and Captain Xie the information passed down to him by Naval superiors and a disciplinary committee of the Navy. And he shouted, `This time you guys made a terrible mistake!' Hearing this, Captain Wang became frightened and explained 'Oh, I didn't know he didn't know my nephew had Taiwan military connections! The only thing I knew was that he was my nephew. That was all.' Knowing it was a lie, the Admiral just quieted him down. He responded, `OK, that's enough. What has happened has happened. And this time because of the nature of this incident, you guys are in big trouble. And no one else can help you.' "All three of these officers, at the time, were involved with Miss Wang from the National Security Ministry. And she had unlimited access to their offices. When she wished to see the Admiral, she need make no prearrangement and was always waved on in by his secretary. At this moment, she burst into their meeting. She confronted her three lovers and learned how much trouble they were in. `You guys are in trouble, I cannot help you this time,' she told them. Together, the four concluded that `in order to keep the boat continuously sailing, which can be profitable to all of us, Captain Wang and Captain Xie would serve as scapegoats, and resign from the service.' They would exonerate in their resignations, Admiral Zhang. So, the next day, Captain Wang handed in his letter of resignation together with a self criticism letter, admitting that the crimes he was charged with had taken place. On the same day, in the afternoon, Captain Xie also handed in his resignation letter only a month after he celebrated with Poly Technologies officials the signing of the French Dolphin contract. Normally, for any naval officer above the rank of Captain, if he wanted to resign from the Naval service, it would take at least two months to get the approval of the superior officers, if it was approved at all. But this time because of their contributions to the Naval Modernization Drive, in which they themselves profited very heavily, their permission was granted in only two days. But because of their important civilian background connections in the business field of China, these two individuals left the Navy and one week later headed for Shenzhen for the Special Economic Zone there. The second day after their arrival in Shenzhen, Mr. Wang and Mr. Xie were all given new jobs. While Mr. Xie served as the vice president of a very influential and important import export trading corporation in Shenzhen, Mr. Wang served as senior consultant in the same company. And within a short time they were also given luxurious apartments in Zhuhai, which was another special economic zone facing Macau across the sea. "This was the first time in the history of the PLA that senior officers, especially the officer heavily indoctrinated in the political warfare system, charged with serious transgressions, resigned and then so smoothly and quickly moved into profitable and influential positions at the forefront of trade in China. "Their resignations from the Navy created both a deep shock and a profound impression upon the rank and file of fellow officers in the service. The signal seemed to be clear. `To serve the people is always your business,' one officer explained his conclusions from the incident. `While to serve self interests and promote them under the disguise of serving public functions was the real alternate goal.' "The decisions that these four individuals made no doubt very often favored the French! After that it was more difficult for the French to get their weapons systems selected by the PLA and Poly Technologies. Within a few weeks, Mrs. Zhang was `handed back' to the National Security Ministry, no worse for the wear. "And a short time after that, young Captain Zhang and his wife were given a very nice apartment on the seventh floor of a Naval apartment building located west of the Naval Compound Headquarters. And he spent 20,000 renminbi only for interior decorations of the apartment. They brought out of storage some of the loot they had acquired from foreign transactions. They had several large screen colored television sets and vcrs, a hand carved snack bar, imported negative ion generators, French made hunting rifles and British pistols, and a silver plated German machine gun. The guns were displayed in a glass doored cabinet. Imported French wine and champagne was displayed on a on a large wine rack. When asked where they acquired these items, they say that they brought them back from France, never mentioning that some of these items were also bought in China with public funds.
Tuesday, May 21, 2013
Gen Tran Bach Dang: We Believe in in Forgiving and Forgetting
General Tran Bach Dang
"We Believe In Forgiving and Forgetting"
I was in the leadership of the National Liberation Front in Tay Ninh province in the spring of 1975, working in the high command planning the spring offensive against the government of South Vietnam. Of course I was in close touch with General Van Tien Dung who was commanding the People's Liberation Army.
The Cao Dai religion is centered in Tay Ninh, of course. And the Cao Dai, although mainly a religion, did have a militant part with their own soldiers. But they split into two sides. One functioned as a supplementary force for the South Vietnamese government, but the other part worked also with the NLF people.
The Montagnards were in Ban Me Thout and the Central Highlands in 1975. Some of them were in FULRO, an organization that was formed by the CIA. But there was another group of Montagnards led by Mr. Ibid Aleo. That group had been working with the NLF for a long long time. And other Montagnards joined the Army of General Van Tien Dung when the battle of Ban Me Thuot began. They turned on the South Vietnamese soldiers and joined us. There was also another group that had been working with us in the Central Highlands all along.
You should know also that we had also infiltrated the highest ranks of the government of Nguyen Van Thieu. We had infiltrated it a lot. A lot! There was some lower infiltration of our staff, too, but only at the lower levels and never at the higher levels.
I want to clarify an important point. Gen. Dung was only a part in a big system. He was the front battle commander. He had nothing at all to do with tactics and with timing. He had other duties on the front. The chief commander at that time was General Vo Nguyen Giap.
The main concern was how to get rid of the intervention of the American government in Vietnam. We were focusing in the Paris Agreement on how to get rid of the American presence in the South. Once that force was gone, the plan for taking over the South was an easily calculated step.
Once the Americans were gone it was easy because then at last it was just Vietnamese against Vietnamese. The Vietnamization of the war, that is what we wanted. Now it was between the Vietnamese.
By the beginning of 1975 when we took Phuoc Long we knew that we could advance faster than we had planned because we knew there would be no American intervention. And the South Vietnamese army did not strike back successfully in Phuoc Long Province. Before they had always fought back. But the ARVN did nothing to take back the town of Phuoc Binh, so we believed that this time we could move and move fast.
After the fall of Phuoc Long, the South Vietnamese President Thieu sent a Congressional delegation to the US to ask for aid for more ammunition and supply. The delegation was led by Mr. Nguyen Van De, the chairman of the military committee in the Congress. He went to the US and talked to President Ford and asked for $300 million in military aid and represented the picture of South Vietnam, and when President Ford listened to what he had to say, Ford knew there was nothing that he could do to prevent defeat in the South. And when the delegation came back to Vietnam Mr. Dey prepared a report and sent it to Hanoi to the Revolutionary force in Hanoi to let them know what happened. Mr. Dey, you see, was a South Vietnamese congressman but he was also working for the NLF. So he kept us posted on what was happening.
That is the degree to which we had infiltrated the government of South Vietnam. We had infiltrated them at the very highest levels. So De met with president Ford and asked for $300 million but he represented the NLF too. So he presented his case in such a way that the US government said that no, that it would do no good. So right away he prepared a report to inform the us as to what the US government was thinking. When we got that report we knew that there was no way at all that the US government would intervene again in Vietnam.
You see we didn't have to infiltrate the American Embassy or the American Central Intelligence Agency in Saigon at low levels like secretaries. We went higher than that. We actually maintained very high posts within those organizations, not just secretaries or something like that. Only in high places did we infiltrate. Absolutely in the highest positions. Big People. We sent in a colonel from the NLF who was also became a colonel in the South and then he worked with the American military intelligence system. And then another one of our infiltrators, Mr. Phan Xuan An, wrote stories for Time magazine a lot. The special advisor to Mr. Thieu was also one of us -- Huynh Van Trong. As a special advisor for Mr. Thieu, he met with Kissinger and Nixon and spoke with them but all the time he was working with the NLF. Ha-ha!
We did not use women who were sleeping with American officials or intelligence officers. You see why we did not have to work that way.
We did find that our infiltration of the American Embassy and the Central Intelligence Agency were not that important because they really didn't know much about what was going on.
I had been in Saigon many times and was in Saigon in 1975. I was not afraid of being betrayed by anyone. No I wasn't afraid because the system was very tight and I had organized everything here so I knew that our security system here was good. I came to Saigon. I was the first secretary of the Party in the South stationed in Saigon, and in the 1960s I was here. Then in 1975 I was in Tay Ninh province until I moved with the revolutionary forces back into Saigon once more.
I came into Saigon on April 30th. I came with the headquarters unit and moved into the city with them on the morning of April 30th.
I did not go to the Presidential Palace. That was not my assignment. I was delegated to oversee the receiving of all the mass media functions within the city. That was my job.
I was in charge of the looking after the ideological and psychological aspects of the city.
Were the Southerners afraid of a bloodbath when the NVA arrived? I don't believe that the people were afraid of a bloodbath. Remember I came from the city, and in 1968 I organized and directed the Tet offensive in Saigon. I knew the people of the city and knew what the people were thinking. They came out to the street to welcome the incoming Army so I knew that they were not afraid at that time.
This place where we are talking now was the home of the former deputy U. S. ambassador, William Porter. When this William Porter and Mr. McGeorge Bundy and other high American government officials were visiting him here, who do you think was living next door to this house? I was! Porter and high American officials were here, right here in this courtyard talking, and I lived next door. Right over there. I could see them and hear them. There was nothing for me to fear in Saigon. I was protected by the populace here. The people knew who I was and what I was doing.
If the US had left behind some lower level people in the Embassy when they left in 1975 that would have been very beneficial for both sides. Ambassador Graham Martin did not have to leave. Vu Van Mau demanded that the Americans leave because he said the National Liberation Front demanded it. The directive though was not meant for the Embassy or the diplomatic people, but it was meant to get the Defense Attache Office military people -- we wanted them out of the country. So that was a very big mistake. The Americans misunderstood that and withdrew the Embassy people. The Americans were just too scared and they left. But they were not required to leave by us. We didn't want them to leave, in fact.
Before we attacked Phuoc Long province at the end of 1974 our plan was to capture the South by 1976, that is true. The thing was, though, that it was out of our hands. We hit Phuoc Long and then Ban Me Thuot. We intended then to go to Kontum and Pleiku or east. What happened after that was all the fault of the South Vietnamese troops. They just took off and ran away. So the rapid emergency replanning of events had to take place because of the withdrawal of their troops voluntarily. Suddenly we did not have to wait until 1976 to complete our plans. We were aware that Brigadier Ted Serong had proposed to President Thieu a withdrawal plan, but we just did not think that Thieu would ever order it to happen. I want to point out that the plan of Serong -- you see we were aware of the details of the plan at the same time that they were presented to President Thieu, and we analyzed them, too -- was to take groups from the Central Highlands and protect the South. But President Thieu ordered a withdrawal and it was a chaotic withdrawal and that was the end of the story. What happened was that after taking over Ban Me Thuot we had a meeting of high ranking officials to ponder the possibility of American intervention. It was attended by Le Duan. And the conclusion was that there was no way that the Americans would participate in this fighting or that they would intervene in the fighting to save the South. So we decided to achieve the final victory in 1975, a year early.
I slept over there in the high rise nearby on the night of April 30th. At that time I was too busy with my new duties, overseeing the mass media, working 24 hours a day, and so I didn't have any personal or private thoughts that day. I was just too engrossed in my work at that time. At that time we had 400 reporters in Saigon, and so it was important to keep the news going out to the foreign reporters. So for the first week of May I was very busy keeping the news going out.
There were some western reporters here. Not all of them had run away. There were still some here. Alan Dawson was here and I met with him, I recall.
As to Ambassador Graham Martin's account as to why we shelled Tan Son Nhut airport on the night of April 28th, 1975, because the South Vietnamese Air Force had been allowed to fly its F5E planes to Thailand, well, that is just a made up story, make believe. There never was any agreement with the Russians about a time for the Americans to get out. That is not true. Somebody made it up. The Russians controlled nothing in Vietnam at that time. Nothing. This thing was planned entirely by the North Vietnamese government. The Russian government was not even informed as to what we planned or what was happening.
The real purpose that we shelled the runway of Tan Son Nhut on the night of April 28th not because the Air Force had withdrawn their airplanes. We shelled the airport, simply because that is when the artillery units arrived within shelling distance of Tan Son Nhut. That is why they shelled it. Because we could.
We did not shell the Americans during their withdrawal because there was a delegation from the South Vietnamese who came to Tan Son Nhut to negotiate with people at our base at Camp Davis. General Minh took power on the 28th and directed that people come to the air base and talk to us and because of that we stopped all of our plans to attack the city. We had planned to shell the city with 150,000 artillery shells, but because of appeals from a delegation from Tran Van Minh, we stopped shelling the city after the night of April 28th. The men who were sent out were Father Chan Tin and Mr. Trung Ngoc Lieng and they came to Tan San Nhut to negotiate with the NLF.
Minh directed these people to come and talk to our side. We had a representative group from the North stationed in Tan Son Nhut at the time, and there was communication going on at that time.
As for the security of the flight path from the US Embassy to the sea, if you wanted to hit the helicopters, you had to position yourself in a place where you could hit them. But the place where our guns would be stationed was in a marshy area and so we could not hit those planes. And second there was no reason to do that since there were only civilians on board and not military personnel and so we did not want to hit those individuals. We had nothing against them.
Two points. First, because this side was victorious, if we were to lose the war, there would have been bitterness and hatred, but because we won we are happy and not hateful. Second, the cultural trait of the Vietnamese, we believe in forgiving and forgetting. When the two sides were enemies we had to fight, but once the war was over there was no more reason to be hateful, That is a cultural trait of the Vietnamese.
In 1954, when we tried to liberate the whole country and only got half of it, at that time we felt bitterness and hatred. But now we are victorious and so bear no hatred.
Of course the American government now owes the Vietnamese a moral obligation. There is no doubt about it. Whether or not that obligation is a financial one, that depends on how one believes. That is in dispute. There are differences of opinion on that. However, I believe that the American government should just contribute to the rebuilding of Vietnam, but not by paying a war-time reparation.
I have met with a number of journalists and researchers during the past months. And some of them were Americans. And they have the same question: What should the Americans do in Vietnam now that the war is over?
The past is over. We can label the past anything we want to -- mistake, evil, miscalculation. Whatever you want, you can call it. Personally, I believe it was something that was regrettable. I want to stop at that. I call it regrettable. Regrettable. It was a mistake. But what was done was done. We cannot bring back the past. We cannot bring back the dead. And so now we have to try to go on because we all live on the same planet and if we carry on hatred it will not do anyone any good at all.
Sunday, May 12, 2013
Jean Sauvageot: Kiss Vietnam Goodbye
Jean A. Sauvageot.
Just on the eve of the signing of the Paris Agreement, I was the liaison coordination officer in the Vietnamese prime minister's office. And prior to the, just prior to actually initialing the Paris Agreement, I really didn't have a whole lot of time in the Prime Minister's office because I was put on a special task force comprised of Ellsworth Bunker, and deputy ambassador Charles Whitehouse, political counselor Josiah Bennett and myself as the fourth guy. The task force was to take these drafts of the Paris Agreement that were coming out of the Kissinger-Le Duc Tho dialogue, in its final hours, and to present these various drafts to President Thieu and to his nephew, Hoang Duc Nha. And also to present it to foreign minister Lam. And so now my function in this thing was to compare the Vietnamese and the English language versions of the text. It was my responsibility to tell Ambassador Bunker that in my opinion the texts were the same, or different, and if different, how different. And then Ambassador Bunker could decide, then based on my comparison of the Vietnamese and English language versions whether he wanted to send a cable back to Paris to Kissinger and raise this as an issue to be resolved, or whether to live with it, ignore it or whatever. One of the reasons this was important is that the Vietnamese on looking over the text of the Paris Agreement, often raised questions of differences in the text, because remember the Vietnamese we are talking about, President Thieu, himself, had a fair English language capability, Hoang Duc Nha had a very good English capability, so they were quite capable of comparing the texts for themselves. And they did. And because one of the provisions was that the Vietnamese and English language versions are equally binding. So the Vietnamese saw a certain differences in the text and would raise these as an issue to be resolved. I think it is worth bearing in mind that the South Vietnamese, our allies, the Republic of Vietnam, had a vested interest, a legitimate interest in pointing out any discrepancies in the text, with the view towards either slowing down the process, tightening it up, or whatever, because the basic context in which they were operating is in the context of an agreement they perceived correctly was stacked against them. It doesn't take a military strategist to see that when we agreed to sign an agreement that would leave North Vietnamese troops in South Vietnam, the so-called leopard spots, that quite obviously the agreement was stacked against our allies and in favor of the Hanoi regime. So, therefore, there was a very understandable propensity for them to point out all of these things.
I'll give you an example. This did not occur during one of the meetings that I attended, this was before Ambassador Bunker brought me into it. One of the Vietnamese, I don't know who, objected to the term that the Vietnamese text used for the United States. After all there is more than one Vietnamese word for the United States. I can think of three right off the top of my head. And they all mean the United States. And the South Vietnamese, told Ambassador Bunker who in turn relayed to Kissinger, that the term Hanoi was using in the Vietnamese text, was pejorative, that did not show the respect for the United States that would be connoted by the other term. And the term that the Hanoi government was using at that time was Nuoc My, that simply means country and My that is generically it means pretty or beautiful, but the two together are a fairly common Vietnamese word for the US. Now in more formal connotation for the US was in the word Hoa Ky. And that is also a common name for the US, but it is somewhat more formal in its connotation. And then there are other words. But anyway, again, they raised this question, sometimes in fact when I was at the meeting, and Ambassador Bunker did turn to me and ask me about it and I explained the differences to him, and we all went along with at least raising their objection in Paris. Kissinger did apparently take it up with Le Duc Tho because in any event the Vietnamese made the change in the Vietnamese text to Hoa Ky and they took out Nuoc My. I don't think the Vietnamese cared one way or another and frankly I can't tell you whether they meant it to be mildly pejorative or not. And I did point out to Ambassador Bunker, and I don't remember whether I did this privately or in front of the South Vietnamese, but that I had seen the term on some occasions, Nuoc My, in South Vietnamese official documents. So it was not in my mind, a big issue. But I point this out to show the sensitivity over these issues.
Now here is another example I discovered on my own, the Vietnamese never raised this. And I raised this issue with the ambassador, the ambassador did telegraph it to Kissinger and nothing was ever done about it and I don't know why, whether it was Kissinger thought it wasn't worth broaching or he did broach it and Hanoi wasn't responsive or they decided they could just live with it or what. But, the without referring to the document right in front of me I may not remember word for word, but the gist of it was this, in the English language version, the this part of the paris agreement stated that the US would not intervene in the internal affairs of South Vietnam. The Vietnamese language version connotation was that the US would not "continue" its intervention in South Vietnam. The difference being, as I told the ambassador, that in the Vietnamese language version we in effect confessed that we had been intervening in South Vietnam. In the English language version all that we were making was a pledge for the future. We would not intervene in the affairs of South Vietnam after signing the agreement. In the Vietnamese language version it meant that we would not continue our intervention, which meant a confession of a sort that we had been intervening. Now to my personal point of view, that was a more substantive issue than the term used for the US. Yet they changed the term in Paris, the Vietnamese made the change, but not about the continuing intervention.
And I don't know why. I was never disturbed by it. I didn't look at it as a big issue. But it was simply my duty to point these discrepancies out. It may very well have been a considered decision by Kissinger that this was a difference in nuance that we could well live with. If the Vietnamese found this satisfactory, and we found satisfactory, in English, it might just simply complicate the process of raising too many issues of this type, particularly when whichever way you read, it doesn't lead to any difference in what you actually do to implement the agreement. Nevertheless, in the Vietnamese language version there was that little nuance in that we confessed that we had been intervening in the internal affairs of South Vietnam.
anyway, that was what I was doing for the few days of transition between my assignment between liaison coordination officer at the prime ministers office, which was coming to an end with the Paris agreement, and my new assignment, that began on, as I recall, 28 January 1973, as the interpreter to the chief of the US delegation to the Four Party Joint Military Commission. The chief of the US delegation was Major General Woodward. Remember he had a background in negotiating with the Communists in that he had been involved in the negotiations with the North Koreans on the Pueblo. So I don't know if that had some bearing on his being picked for this or not. But he was picked for it. And, then, I was assigned, taken out of the prime ministers office, took off my civilian clothes, went back into an army uniform, after all I was on the four party joint military commission, and served as General Woodward's interpreter throughout the sixty days of meetings of 28 January 1973 until 28 March 1973. And of course the four parties to the Four Party Joint Military Commission were the US delegation, our allies, the Republic of Vietnam, the DRV, the Democratic Republic of Vietnam or the North Vietnamese, and the Provisional Revolutionary Government of Vietnam, which were the southern communists, and the PRG had specifically been created by Hanoi to serve their interests in the Paris Agreement. And the interpreting arrangements were that each delegation chief, the chiefs of each of these four delegations, had his own interpreter, and each interpreter was to listen to his chief speak in his language, and then interpret into the other language. So it was my job to listen to General Woodward speak in English and then restate what he had said in Vietnamese. The other interpreters listened to Vietnamese and interpreted it into English. The thing of it is that some of their interpreters were not really up to speed, particularly at the beginning, and so I would have to help them, even from Vietnamese to English. And of course I was glad to do that. And then they, it was very strange, the South Vietnamese had the capability to have the best interpreter in the room, but they chose not to have. They had no dearth of people who could graduated from American Universities and everything, but they didn't use anybody like that. The Hanoi delegation started with a very weak interpreter. He tried very hard and I tried to help him, but they removed their competent one first and replace him with a major who was quite competent, and the PRG used a number of interpreters and most of them were competent. That was just some of what I was doing.
On March 31, my wife, my daughter and I all got on a plane and returned to the US. And after that I had only returned to Vietnam only occasionally for various kinds of temporary duty.
I think it's been well established, in literature, that the South was dragged into the agreement, pressured into it. I had a lost of close Vietnamese friends. They were trying to put the best face on it, but they certainly knew that this agreement did not favor them.
There was one thing that this agreement, that some of them had some confidence in. And that is the secret pledge given to them that should the North Vietnamese violate the treaty with large scale military operations, that we would retaliate, militarily, and that our response would be effective and we would do what it took militarily to preclude a North Vietnamese military success in the case of an invasion. And I can only conjecture that the pledge was given in good faith. But anyway, it wasn't realistic, because as anybody might be able to surmise, in a political democracy like the US, the government cannot get out too much in front of Congress and the popular feeling, and once we got out of Vietnam, there was no support for getting reinvolved. And then of course at that time nobody could foresee the weakening of the presidency through Watergate.
The Vietnamese with whom we were working during the negotiation were quite insistent that they have access to the English as well as the Vietnamese form of the treaty. So I would discount Nha's complaint that the treaty was presented to them only in English. They had an English language capability and they would have been absolutely paranoid and rightly so if we had tried to restrict their access to the English language only. They had access to both and they reviewed both in lock step with us, and the story that they got the treaty in English just doesn't ring true based upon my own personal involvement.
We were, of course, the agreement was that the North Vietnamese could stay in the South but there were supposed to be all kinds of stipulations as to how they could be resupplied, through what ports of entry and all of that.
The Four part military commission. Generically what it was supposed to do was to meet for 60 days in Saigon, after the Paris Agreement was signed and work out the implementation of the Paris Agreement in its specific aspects. One of the major ones being the monitoring of the prisoner exchange and implementing the prisoner exchange and another big one was the withdrawal of the US troops.
Now what one of the principles of implementing anything in the four party joint military commission was that everything had to be on the principle of unanimous agreement. If any part objected to anything it didn't happen. There was no feasible way for any party to object to the major elements of the Paris Agreement which had already been negotiated and agreed to, most notably the withdrawal of the US troops and the prisoner exchange. Those things had to go forward or there would have been a breakdown of the Paris Agreement right from the very beginning. We didn't want that and Hanoi didn't want it -- a breakdown. So it would be reasonable not to expect a breakdown of that type.
However, the Four Party Commission was also supposed to try to implement a whole lot of other provisions. For example, it was supposed to monitor the early days of the ceasefire before getting the Intl Commission of Control and Supervision set up. And that meant that a lot of administrative things had to be decided in the very first meetings in the early meetings. Such as what kind of ID cards would the members of the commission have so that they could have access to the various areas under the military control of either the South Vietnamese or the Communists, what kinds of colors would the helicopters be painted if, and what would be the procedures for investigating allegations of violations of the ceasefire. Now these provisions never worked out too well. Another specific one was that we were supposed to try to set up meetings between battlefield commanders to work out the details of the ceasefire in their respective areas. This was never implemented, at least down below the corps level. The idea was to go down to the regimental, battalion and even company level, down to the lower level troop units. That never could be done because one of the four parties objected consistently to it. And therefore it could never be done. Because they felt that they weren't ready to engage in that kind of confrontation with the Communists who were trained, or who they felt were trained to do political proselytizing or whatever kinds of activities you would expect Communist troops under trained communist political cadre to engage in, for which the South Vietnamese would not be prepared.
My feeling when I finally saw the treaty in its final form was sort of "kiss Vietnam goodbye." That was my feeling, exactly. In fact, I was pessimistic even before the treaty was signed, but after the Paris Agreement was signed, I figured that Hanoi felt that, and probably rightly so, that it was only a matter of time until they could take over the South. I don't think they themselves knew by which route they would take over the South. I think they felt that at some point they could perhaps take the South over by predominantly military means or perhaps, depending how things evolved, there would be more emphasis on the political struggle, supported by, of course, military pressure and proselytizing and terrorist activities and the whole spectrum of weapons in the communist arsenal. And I don't think that in 1973 the Hanoi government itself knew by exactly which of those routes they would take over. But by one of the two, they would take over. When South Vietnam was forced to fight the poor man's war due to the reduction of logistical support and everything, why the future was fairly easy to see. I remember one time a just on the eve of the signing of the Paris Agreement, right at that time, early 1973, some of us, some of the old Vietnam hands had supper with deputy Ambassador Whitehouse, and during that supper we discussed a number of agenda items of business, such as the efficacy or lack there of of certain South Vietnamese military units, observations about the government and so on. After the dinner he asked the $64 question, of every participant to the discussion, which was, "What is the future of South Vietnam?" He was very shocked, he said he was shocked by what he heard, because among the participants, only one believed that a noncommunist South Vietnam would survive. All of the others, as he observed, all of the others of us, were only arguing among ourselves about how long it would take to unravel. I was the only one that erred on the side of pessimism, giving it about one year. Another person who was very close to me hit it right about on the mark with an estimate of about two years. And then others were giving it three, four or five years, but what was shocking to ambassador Whitehouse was that only one of this group of people with long experience in country, and for whom he had a high regard felt that it would last.
Not before I saw the final form of the agreement did I give it one year. Although I was overall pessimistic. I used to tell my South Vietnamese friends, the ones that I was very close to, that sometime the US was going to leave South Vietnam, really would be leaving. And that when this process of Vietnamization started, my personal emphasis to my best South Vietnamese friends was that they really had to make Vietnamization work. That no one should delude himself that the US could stay in Vietnam indefinitely. Or, having left that it could feasibly return, given domestic politics. And I used to tell my friends that first of all one could not fully understand how the US got involved in Vietnam in the first place without a good understanding of domestic politics in America. If you relied only on geopolitics, the explanation would be insufficient. You have got to get into domestic politics, the relations and the competition between the Republican and Democratic parties and all this kind of thing to understand it, and by the same token one would want to make a prognosis about the period of Vietnam in the post American involvement, then one also would have to understand the domestic American politics by which the US would some day leave, and what the likely politics would be after it did leave. Failing to take those factors into account was very dangerous.
I'll give you another illustration of this coming at it from a very different way. One of my temporary duty assignments, post war, was from Christmas of 1974, as I recall I got into the country the day after Christmas on 26 December, and stayed there until about 17 January 1975. Now at that time I was my permanent assignment was a the US Army's command and general staff college at Leavenworth, Kansas. But I left Leavenworth to team up with an officer from the DIA to make an assessment of the situation, and the reason for this was that many people in Washington were getting increasingly skeptical of Ambassador Martin's reporting from Saigon, as to whether it was really realistic or not. And so it was decided to send a couple of people to take look. Now, during this period of TDY, we went all over the country and talked to people from Vietnamese generals down through the field grades to sometimes enlisted men in the military, village chiefs, hamlet chiefs, very wide cross section of Vietnamese society, and a number of Americans. During this period I had occasion to meet with an old friend of mine, General Hai, who was the at that time the division commander of the 7th division in Me Tho, and I had a long supper with general Hai. We had a long conversation about many things, very private. And he told me about an experience of his when he was the director of national police, as a Col. and I remembered him from that time, to, when he had been assigned as the director of national police. As a colonel. And he told me about his interviews he had conducted of Vietnamese communist cadre who the national police captured and how he interviewed them over a period of time, a number of them. And he used to ask them who they honestly believed could win the war. And most of the Hanoi cadre men forthrightly stated that their side would win, not the South Vietnamese. And so he always asked them why. Over a period of time he built a little matrix of their prototypical answers, the answers that he most frequently got. And the reasons that they gave were this, these three: First, they said that Hanoi would win because the North had political unity and the South was factionalized; the second reason that they gave was that the South suffered from endemic corruption and that the North did not tolerate corruption, at least of any magnitude. And third, they said was the difference in the nature of foreign support that the North received and that the South received. They said that the American support might be more effective than the Chinese and the Soviet support for the North on a temporary basis in that the Americans provided very modern weapons and very modern fire power and sent a half a million of their own troops to do a lot of the fighting and that was a help to South Vietnam in the short run. But these cadres said that the thing that they understood was that the Americans could not stay forever, some day they would leave. The South Vietnamese being used to fighting the war with half a million troops in country and with all the support mechanisms, the air and everything, would suffer "lethal withdrawal symptoms," when they were withdrawn, and that would create the opportunity by which the North would be able to seize South Vietnam. And I would say that was a very prophetic analysis.
Now they did do well in 1973, militarily. But I think part of the prophecy was that the high levels of logistical support would not remain.
The war in South Vietnam was infinitely more complex than the war in Korea. In Korea you really had a situation where a communist North was pitted against a non Communist South. And to that extent there were political front lines. After all, some of Ho Chi Minh's most effective allies were communist cadres in the South, and there was a strong communist organization in South Vietnam throughout the war. But by no means defunct after 1968, although some people led themselves to believe that.
When I got into South Vietnam in late December in 1974, I had a very early audience with Ambassador Martin, and Ambassador Martin, he told me that there was no more effective Southern Communists in the Delta, that it was just North Vietnamese Army units controlling the action. But frankly that was not what I saw when I went down there. And in fact General Hai told me specifically that the that there were still local cadre that were committing acts of sabotage against his installations. Those, he said were not NVA, they were locals with legitimate South Vietnamese identification cards. In the end if things are going badly in a war situation it is hard to see how a protracted cover up of the truth can serve our interests. But at least covering it up among those who are responsible for public policy, for the implementation of the war effort, that kind of cover up could never be justified and could never be effective.
We had no press censorship as we did in WWII as we did when we were involved in a struggle for our own survival, we really do play into the hands of a totalitarian adversary, such as Hanoi and its supporters like the Soviet Union and China, which in their own countries totally control the press, which learned the art of playing to the foreign press, they learned the art of disinformation as it applied to the Vietnam situation, so that many prestigious publications in the west were carrying basically the Hanoi line.
I was not inured to the press in Vietnam. But I may have a broader perspective than some of the people who are very bitter in their denunciations of the press, some of it richly deserved. But I think it is very simplistic to say that the press did us in in Vietnam, because to say that almost asks more questions than it answers. In the first place it makes the generic mistake of attributing the loss of Vietnam to a single agency or a single causitive factor, which is itself ridiculous because in fact there were many factors at play. It is even difficult to assess which of the several independent variables that account for the collapse of Vietnam, its difficult to weight any one of them because any number of them played a factor. Some of these were interrelated factors themselves. You get into methodological problems of assessing multicolinearity, the interrelationship among independent variables, and if people don't think in those methodological terms, it is difficult to bring a rigorous analysis to a phenomenon as complex as the fall of South Vietnam. However, having said that, the press really was culpable, in my view, towards the end of the war. But people who do nothing but dump on the role of the press in Vietnam display a very short memory because as a matter of fact, I believe if you look back at a number of American publication in the early days of Vietnam involvement, you would find the press almost uniformly supportive of our effort. So they did not start out negatively. They became negative later. And I remember now reading in various magazines, Life, Time, Newsweek, a number of articles that were quite laudatory of our efforts in Vietnam. And it would be not at all unusual for editors of a magazine to send a reporter out or a reporter and a photographer out to follow some American adviser around and do a really nice write up for the hometown paper, whatever. Here's Captain So and So of the Special forces or somebody advising a Vietnamese battalion and they would say very nice things about what we were trying to do in Vietnam and it was very positive and very upbeat.
And people forget that, some of them because they were probably very young at that time. They turned against the war later. And frankly, some of their later opposition was as unexamined and as superficial as perhaps their early support was also superficial. At least patriotic in its basic sense, but one could hardly say that it was rigorously analytical in all the dynamics involved. You don't want to tar everybody with the same brush, of course. There were, I had good contacts with some very fine journalists throughout the war. People I had very much respect for. But having said that, they certainly did our effort a tremendous amount of damage, once they turned against the war. But to put it in perspective, you have to realize that much of the rhetoric that responsible officials in Washington and Saigon put out about the war was incredible, insulting to the intelligence, many of the things that were happening on the ground didn't compute, that is they didn't correlate to what journalists could see on the ground. So the relationship became more and more adversarial. So none of this, I remember one example, where a briefer at MACV gave a precise body count in a briefing that resulted from an air strike, and somebody asked the airspeed and altitude of the jet fighters delivering the airstrike over a jungle canopy. It was so many hundreds of knots and a thousand or more feet up in the air, and of course the next question was obviously, then how did the pilot render this count through the jungle at this speed and this altitude and speed. And people get their backs up on things of that sort. And people get angry, they know they're being given a line, and they start looking for dirt, and all that sort of thing. But again this calls into question a lot of other things that bear on this, if we're the generic one is, we should not get involved in a serious effort to guarantee, to aid and abet, the national survival of another country unless we do it to win. And if the decision is made that it is important enough to US interests to keep Nicaragua, for example, from going communist, or from being a country dominated by Cuban or Soviet interests, or if the decision is made to keep South Vietnam or South Korea out of the hands of the communists, then the whole range of measures necessary to insure success need to be taken or you don't do it. And it seems that unless you put the economy in the case of South Vietnam, on more of a war time footing, LBJ thought we could have guns and butter, at the same time, unless you're willing to control access by the press, censorship if you will, for that war zone, I'm sure there would be a big hue and cry about it, just as it was in Grenada where they couldn't hit the beach right away. But Grenada was a big success. It was a liberation, the communists were denied access to that area, but anyway we didn't have pictures coming out of Grenada immediately, showing whatever the worst side of the initial conflict might be.
So the message is that we gotta go in with a war-winning strategy when we go into these places and be very circumspect about where you go in.
When I came back in 1975, the report was written by an officer from the DIA. I only contributed trip reports to him, so that I could go right back to Leavenworth and keep teaching my classes. And I gave him a really in effect the results of interviews that I had independently that I had with a number of Vietnamese.
My personal conclusion was more pessimistic than the report that came out, although the report itself was disturbing enough. And it made a big correction for Martin's reporting. But my personal conclusion was that things were going to fall apart very fast. While I was there they took the province capital of Phuoc Long. The South Vietnamese, I'll tell you some of the things I based my impression on. One thing is, the South Vietnamese were already fighting the poor man's war. Denied adequate logistical support they had to ration ammunition in a way that they never had before. The withdrawal effects of the diminution of American logistical support and the withdrawal of American troops would be lethal. And it wasn't just the Vietnamese communist cadre that were telling this to General Hai during these interviews, but there was a very prominent South Vietnamese Colonel, who was saying that over and over again years before this happened. And his name was Col. Nguyen Be, and Col. Be was the commandant of the National Training Center for Rural Development Cadre, or Revolutionary Development Cadre, as the Americans chose to call it in English. But Be was trying to train these cadre that came through the school to operate in a more independent manner in the hamlets and villages from which they came. Going back they were supposed to work with the people back there to build what they called the people's self defense forces, using all kinds of methods to safeguard themselves from communist penetration and communist infiltration. And they were , part of the thrust of Be's thinking and training and theory stated often publicly in speeches and in his writing, which he made available for his own chain of command was that the Americans would go home some day and that they ought to be ready for that day and that they would have to begin sooner rather than later to cut the apron strings and to be able to do more on their own. And that it is to the credit of the South Vietnamese government that they gave him the support that they did by having him in that training center. But it was not something that was institutionalized throughout the country as he would like to have had it be.
So, they were fighting the poor man's war, the North was increasingly strong and rich in its fire power. Logistics. The Defense Attache, at his end of the tour report, predicted in the summer of 1974 that there would be a virtually irresistible violent large scale North Vietnamese invasion and he was looking at it from the standpoint of what he could see. The North Vietnamese were training to do this. In their improvements and in their logistical posture, in their pipelines of petroleum going into the South, with their logistical network, and he could see the improvements through his intelligence gathering. He could see the improvements in their conduct of fire and maneuver, the coordination among infantry and artillery and armor branches, which they were sorely lacking in 1972 when they failed in their effort to take over the South. But he could see all these things and put them together, being a man of eminently sound mind and all, he was one of those guys who believed that if it looks like an elephant and it talks like an elephant then you're probably looking at an elephant. And he said they were coming and that they were going to strike with violent power. He knew this, Murray knew this, and he was very pessimistic and very sad as he left in the summer of 1974. And when I got there the situation was further exacerbated, it had further deteriorated. And in this same context, Congress was denying even a $300 million supplement. And that had another bad impact on the morale of the South Vietnamese. Which is not to say that I believe that the $300 million supplement would have rescued them. But not having it was still another kick in the teeth. And then another thing, in my direct interviews I saw such a pattern of dysfunctional behavior, it reminds you about the old saw of the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer, they were on a downward spiral, they didn't have enough, yet they were making very poor use of what they had.
I'll give you a little story of the hand grenades. My, my. It's a little story but it tells you a lot. I had heard that there was a village down in Cho Gao district down in Binh Duong province in the Delta. That the village chief was described as a very heroic figure who had been marshaling his paramilitary forces, the popular forces, to stand up to the night raids of the Vietnamese communists, but that he was fighting a losing battle and that he had suffered from many desertions in the ranks of the popular forces. I don't remember now but it must have been that 2/3s of them deserted or something like that. Now a Vietnamese friend of mine that used to work with me when I was in Vietnam persuaded me to drive out there to take a look. And meet this guy. I was frankly worried about doing it. Simply because having relocated my family in Kansas I didn't want to get knocked off at the end of the war or something, but he convinced me that I really wouldn't be doing my job if I didn't go out there. I loaded him up in an old civilian car, you couldn't go any more than about ten miles an hour, in little dirt road with big potholes and everything. We got out there and I met this village and talked to him and he was really a tremendous person, and he was resigned to dying in that village, resisting the communists. But he explained that one of the reasons that people were deserting was that he could not give them adequate supplies of ammunition. And a case in point was hand grenades. That the district would not issue him enough hand grenades. He could not provide more than one or two grenades, per popular force soldiers going on night patrols, which resulted in people not wanting to go night patrols. Which resulted in people not wanting to go on night patrols. He felt that the district had sufficient stocks but they were reluctant to hand them out to the district and hamlet level. The story is worth telling in that I found this pattern many many places. I found district chiefs with mortars who wouldn't let their mortars out to villages to use. They felt they had to keep the mortars up in the district compound to protect the district. So if you don't let your front line troops have the equipment because you feel it's too scarce and you want to hoard it for yourself, you simply exacerbate the process of erosion by which the communists quickly arrive at your doorstep. Now, I went up to Saigon several times, and one of my stops in the defense attach office, to meet with major general smith led me to tell him the story that I just told you, about this village chief and the hand grenades. And that led him to introduce me to another major general who had just come in from Bangkok. He had a lot of computer printouts that showed stockage levels. And he what he really told me in effect was that the story that I was telling him couldn't be relevant to anything in the war because he had his computer printouts that showed that the stockage levels of hand grenades in South Vietnam exceeded the highest levels ever, and they had plenty of them. And of course my response was that I knew nothing about the computer print out and second I would not deny the figures that he had in them, but that was what was irrelevant. What was relevant was not how many grenades existed in South Vietnam. What was relevant was that they were not being passed out to the troops. And the political and psychological implications of that. I could envision communist North Vietnamese taking over South Vietnam with high stockages of a whole lot of things in South Vietnam, which they did. But this was the kind of surrealism that confronted me on a number of occasions.
The other thing was that I saw, a lot of Vietnamese told me stories that a lot of them didn't feel that there was any use in continuing the struggle any more against the North. I had a full Colonel tell me that his troops were not going to fight if the North Vietnamese came in force, because the perception was that they would die uselessly. There was no more effective American support, they had been abandoned and the North was getting stronger and stronger. I had stories of parents telling their young sons, if the North Vietnamese come in force, take off your uniform and come home, because it's not worth it. Now that was a departure from the past. They did not use to tell their sons that. Some may have, but never on that scale. But thee was more and more of that. And when you see this and hear this over and over during a two week tdy, you know something is amiss.
It would be very hard for any South Vietnamese person to convey that kind of information to a Vietnamese official and keep his job. I was a nonthreatening figure and a trusted person, somebody who could be trusted to keep secrets, and there was just this terrible deterioration of morale.
I'll tell you a little bitter irony associated with this tdy. And that is, a number of South Vietnamese that I talked to in the Delta, in Long An province specifically, rice farmers and people at that level. I saw evidence and heard evidence from their conversations with me that thee had been a shift in attitudes away from the Communists, away from supporting the communists, toward supporting and in favor of the Saigon government, since 1970, when I did intensive interviews in Long An province and found widespread support for the communists and the national liberation front. What I found was that in 1975, when I went through some of the same areas, I found a decided shift, a sentiment away from the communists, toward support for the Saigon government. Now the bitter irony is, that this shift could not be and was not translated into actual physical support for the Saigon government, because the change in sentiment was accompanied by a perception that, like it or not, the communists were going to win, and therefore, it would be dangerous to stick one's neck out for a losing cause, and few people cared to go on kamikaze missions for causes, no matter how noble.
When Saigon fell I was in Guam to help with the incoming refugees. It was a feeling of great tragedy and in my case, at least, expected tragedy. But, you have to remember there were a lot of people who had been in Vietnam many years, even more than a decade, who knew the Vietnamese well in some ways, and yet remained optimistic almost right up to the end. Personal optimists, in other words, they weren't deceiving other people, they were deceiving themselves. Because I had close friends who told me that they thought I was too pessimistic, and of course my feeling always was that I hoped they were right and I was wrong. But unfortunately that wasn't the case. And I find the loss of South Vietnam for me personally, to be something that bothers me more and more as time passes,rather than less and less. Time is supposed to heal, but for me it doesn't. Because I guess since I expected it to be taken over long before it was taken over, so the fact that they took it over was not a surprise. So I was able to deal with it in the short term. Then, too, in the sense of psychological sense of a death in the family. People go through a sort of subliminal denial process for awhile. But after a while you can't do that anymore. The reality sets in. This is permanent. It's not going to go away.
And the continuation of so much suffering in Vietnam and in Indochina, in Cambodia, the whole protraction of military struggle and everything is depressing, the fact that you have these resourceful industrious people of Vietnam confined and constrained within a communist system, not only a communist system but a system that is even more austere and more harsh by dint of itself being involved in a struggle with China and Cambodia, and that this just spreads the misery. That is part of it. Another reason for me is that at least I am more and more, as time goes on, aware of the tremendous number of opportunities, both personal, in terms of the things that my wife and I could do with her family if there was still a free Vietnam where one could go back and forth, personal opportunities to the geopolitical benefits that would accrue to the US if we were still allied to South Vietnam....
Just on the eve of the signing of the Paris Agreement, I was the liaison coordination officer in the Vietnamese prime minister's office. And prior to the, just prior to actually initialing the Paris Agreement, I really didn't have a whole lot of time in the Prime Minister's office because I was put on a special task force comprised of Ellsworth Bunker, and deputy ambassador Charles Whitehouse, political counselor Josiah Bennett and myself as the fourth guy. The task force was to take these drafts of the Paris Agreement that were coming out of the Kissinger-Le Duc Tho dialogue, in its final hours, and to present these various drafts to President Thieu and to his nephew, Hoang Duc Nha. And also to present it to foreign minister Lam. And so now my function in this thing was to compare the Vietnamese and the English language versions of the text. It was my responsibility to tell Ambassador Bunker that in my opinion the texts were the same, or different, and if different, how different. And then Ambassador Bunker could decide, then based on my comparison of the Vietnamese and English language versions whether he wanted to send a cable back to Paris to Kissinger and raise this as an issue to be resolved, or whether to live with it, ignore it or whatever. One of the reasons this was important is that the Vietnamese on looking over the text of the Paris Agreement, often raised questions of differences in the text, because remember the Vietnamese we are talking about, President Thieu, himself, had a fair English language capability, Hoang Duc Nha had a very good English capability, so they were quite capable of comparing the texts for themselves. And they did. And because one of the provisions was that the Vietnamese and English language versions are equally binding. So the Vietnamese saw a certain differences in the text and would raise these as an issue to be resolved. I think it is worth bearing in mind that the South Vietnamese, our allies, the Republic of Vietnam, had a vested interest, a legitimate interest in pointing out any discrepancies in the text, with the view towards either slowing down the process, tightening it up, or whatever, because the basic context in which they were operating is in the context of an agreement they perceived correctly was stacked against them. It doesn't take a military strategist to see that when we agreed to sign an agreement that would leave North Vietnamese troops in South Vietnam, the so-called leopard spots, that quite obviously the agreement was stacked against our allies and in favor of the Hanoi regime. So, therefore, there was a very understandable propensity for them to point out all of these things.
I'll give you an example. This did not occur during one of the meetings that I attended, this was before Ambassador Bunker brought me into it. One of the Vietnamese, I don't know who, objected to the term that the Vietnamese text used for the United States. After all there is more than one Vietnamese word for the United States. I can think of three right off the top of my head. And they all mean the United States. And the South Vietnamese, told Ambassador Bunker who in turn relayed to Kissinger, that the term Hanoi was using in the Vietnamese text, was pejorative, that did not show the respect for the United States that would be connoted by the other term. And the term that the Hanoi government was using at that time was Nuoc My, that simply means country and My that is generically it means pretty or beautiful, but the two together are a fairly common Vietnamese word for the US. Now in more formal connotation for the US was in the word Hoa Ky. And that is also a common name for the US, but it is somewhat more formal in its connotation. And then there are other words. But anyway, again, they raised this question, sometimes in fact when I was at the meeting, and Ambassador Bunker did turn to me and ask me about it and I explained the differences to him, and we all went along with at least raising their objection in Paris. Kissinger did apparently take it up with Le Duc Tho because in any event the Vietnamese made the change in the Vietnamese text to Hoa Ky and they took out Nuoc My. I don't think the Vietnamese cared one way or another and frankly I can't tell you whether they meant it to be mildly pejorative or not. And I did point out to Ambassador Bunker, and I don't remember whether I did this privately or in front of the South Vietnamese, but that I had seen the term on some occasions, Nuoc My, in South Vietnamese official documents. So it was not in my mind, a big issue. But I point this out to show the sensitivity over these issues.
Now here is another example I discovered on my own, the Vietnamese never raised this. And I raised this issue with the ambassador, the ambassador did telegraph it to Kissinger and nothing was ever done about it and I don't know why, whether it was Kissinger thought it wasn't worth broaching or he did broach it and Hanoi wasn't responsive or they decided they could just live with it or what. But, the without referring to the document right in front of me I may not remember word for word, but the gist of it was this, in the English language version, the this part of the paris agreement stated that the US would not intervene in the internal affairs of South Vietnam. The Vietnamese language version connotation was that the US would not "continue" its intervention in South Vietnam. The difference being, as I told the ambassador, that in the Vietnamese language version we in effect confessed that we had been intervening in South Vietnam. In the English language version all that we were making was a pledge for the future. We would not intervene in the affairs of South Vietnam after signing the agreement. In the Vietnamese language version it meant that we would not continue our intervention, which meant a confession of a sort that we had been intervening. Now to my personal point of view, that was a more substantive issue than the term used for the US. Yet they changed the term in Paris, the Vietnamese made the change, but not about the continuing intervention.
And I don't know why. I was never disturbed by it. I didn't look at it as a big issue. But it was simply my duty to point these discrepancies out. It may very well have been a considered decision by Kissinger that this was a difference in nuance that we could well live with. If the Vietnamese found this satisfactory, and we found satisfactory, in English, it might just simply complicate the process of raising too many issues of this type, particularly when whichever way you read, it doesn't lead to any difference in what you actually do to implement the agreement. Nevertheless, in the Vietnamese language version there was that little nuance in that we confessed that we had been intervening in the internal affairs of South Vietnam.
anyway, that was what I was doing for the few days of transition between my assignment between liaison coordination officer at the prime ministers office, which was coming to an end with the Paris agreement, and my new assignment, that began on, as I recall, 28 January 1973, as the interpreter to the chief of the US delegation to the Four Party Joint Military Commission. The chief of the US delegation was Major General Woodward. Remember he had a background in negotiating with the Communists in that he had been involved in the negotiations with the North Koreans on the Pueblo. So I don't know if that had some bearing on his being picked for this or not. But he was picked for it. And, then, I was assigned, taken out of the prime ministers office, took off my civilian clothes, went back into an army uniform, after all I was on the four party joint military commission, and served as General Woodward's interpreter throughout the sixty days of meetings of 28 January 1973 until 28 March 1973. And of course the four parties to the Four Party Joint Military Commission were the US delegation, our allies, the Republic of Vietnam, the DRV, the Democratic Republic of Vietnam or the North Vietnamese, and the Provisional Revolutionary Government of Vietnam, which were the southern communists, and the PRG had specifically been created by Hanoi to serve their interests in the Paris Agreement. And the interpreting arrangements were that each delegation chief, the chiefs of each of these four delegations, had his own interpreter, and each interpreter was to listen to his chief speak in his language, and then interpret into the other language. So it was my job to listen to General Woodward speak in English and then restate what he had said in Vietnamese. The other interpreters listened to Vietnamese and interpreted it into English. The thing of it is that some of their interpreters were not really up to speed, particularly at the beginning, and so I would have to help them, even from Vietnamese to English. And of course I was glad to do that. And then they, it was very strange, the South Vietnamese had the capability to have the best interpreter in the room, but they chose not to have. They had no dearth of people who could graduated from American Universities and everything, but they didn't use anybody like that. The Hanoi delegation started with a very weak interpreter. He tried very hard and I tried to help him, but they removed their competent one first and replace him with a major who was quite competent, and the PRG used a number of interpreters and most of them were competent. That was just some of what I was doing.
On March 31, my wife, my daughter and I all got on a plane and returned to the US. And after that I had only returned to Vietnam only occasionally for various kinds of temporary duty.
I think it's been well established, in literature, that the South was dragged into the agreement, pressured into it. I had a lost of close Vietnamese friends. They were trying to put the best face on it, but they certainly knew that this agreement did not favor them.
There was one thing that this agreement, that some of them had some confidence in. And that is the secret pledge given to them that should the North Vietnamese violate the treaty with large scale military operations, that we would retaliate, militarily, and that our response would be effective and we would do what it took militarily to preclude a North Vietnamese military success in the case of an invasion. And I can only conjecture that the pledge was given in good faith. But anyway, it wasn't realistic, because as anybody might be able to surmise, in a political democracy like the US, the government cannot get out too much in front of Congress and the popular feeling, and once we got out of Vietnam, there was no support for getting reinvolved. And then of course at that time nobody could foresee the weakening of the presidency through Watergate.
The Vietnamese with whom we were working during the negotiation were quite insistent that they have access to the English as well as the Vietnamese form of the treaty. So I would discount Nha's complaint that the treaty was presented to them only in English. They had an English language capability and they would have been absolutely paranoid and rightly so if we had tried to restrict their access to the English language only. They had access to both and they reviewed both in lock step with us, and the story that they got the treaty in English just doesn't ring true based upon my own personal involvement.
We were, of course, the agreement was that the North Vietnamese could stay in the South but there were supposed to be all kinds of stipulations as to how they could be resupplied, through what ports of entry and all of that.
The Four part military commission. Generically what it was supposed to do was to meet for 60 days in Saigon, after the Paris Agreement was signed and work out the implementation of the Paris Agreement in its specific aspects. One of the major ones being the monitoring of the prisoner exchange and implementing the prisoner exchange and another big one was the withdrawal of the US troops.
Now what one of the principles of implementing anything in the four party joint military commission was that everything had to be on the principle of unanimous agreement. If any part objected to anything it didn't happen. There was no feasible way for any party to object to the major elements of the Paris Agreement which had already been negotiated and agreed to, most notably the withdrawal of the US troops and the prisoner exchange. Those things had to go forward or there would have been a breakdown of the Paris Agreement right from the very beginning. We didn't want that and Hanoi didn't want it -- a breakdown. So it would be reasonable not to expect a breakdown of that type.
However, the Four Party Commission was also supposed to try to implement a whole lot of other provisions. For example, it was supposed to monitor the early days of the ceasefire before getting the Intl Commission of Control and Supervision set up. And that meant that a lot of administrative things had to be decided in the very first meetings in the early meetings. Such as what kind of ID cards would the members of the commission have so that they could have access to the various areas under the military control of either the South Vietnamese or the Communists, what kinds of colors would the helicopters be painted if, and what would be the procedures for investigating allegations of violations of the ceasefire. Now these provisions never worked out too well. Another specific one was that we were supposed to try to set up meetings between battlefield commanders to work out the details of the ceasefire in their respective areas. This was never implemented, at least down below the corps level. The idea was to go down to the regimental, battalion and even company level, down to the lower level troop units. That never could be done because one of the four parties objected consistently to it. And therefore it could never be done. Because they felt that they weren't ready to engage in that kind of confrontation with the Communists who were trained, or who they felt were trained to do political proselytizing or whatever kinds of activities you would expect Communist troops under trained communist political cadre to engage in, for which the South Vietnamese would not be prepared.
My feeling when I finally saw the treaty in its final form was sort of "kiss Vietnam goodbye." That was my feeling, exactly. In fact, I was pessimistic even before the treaty was signed, but after the Paris Agreement was signed, I figured that Hanoi felt that, and probably rightly so, that it was only a matter of time until they could take over the South. I don't think they themselves knew by which route they would take over the South. I think they felt that at some point they could perhaps take the South over by predominantly military means or perhaps, depending how things evolved, there would be more emphasis on the political struggle, supported by, of course, military pressure and proselytizing and terrorist activities and the whole spectrum of weapons in the communist arsenal. And I don't think that in 1973 the Hanoi government itself knew by exactly which of those routes they would take over. But by one of the two, they would take over. When South Vietnam was forced to fight the poor man's war due to the reduction of logistical support and everything, why the future was fairly easy to see. I remember one time a just on the eve of the signing of the Paris Agreement, right at that time, early 1973, some of us, some of the old Vietnam hands had supper with deputy Ambassador Whitehouse, and during that supper we discussed a number of agenda items of business, such as the efficacy or lack there of of certain South Vietnamese military units, observations about the government and so on. After the dinner he asked the $64 question, of every participant to the discussion, which was, "What is the future of South Vietnam?" He was very shocked, he said he was shocked by what he heard, because among the participants, only one believed that a noncommunist South Vietnam would survive. All of the others, as he observed, all of the others of us, were only arguing among ourselves about how long it would take to unravel. I was the only one that erred on the side of pessimism, giving it about one year. Another person who was very close to me hit it right about on the mark with an estimate of about two years. And then others were giving it three, four or five years, but what was shocking to ambassador Whitehouse was that only one of this group of people with long experience in country, and for whom he had a high regard felt that it would last.
Not before I saw the final form of the agreement did I give it one year. Although I was overall pessimistic. I used to tell my South Vietnamese friends, the ones that I was very close to, that sometime the US was going to leave South Vietnam, really would be leaving. And that when this process of Vietnamization started, my personal emphasis to my best South Vietnamese friends was that they really had to make Vietnamization work. That no one should delude himself that the US could stay in Vietnam indefinitely. Or, having left that it could feasibly return, given domestic politics. And I used to tell my friends that first of all one could not fully understand how the US got involved in Vietnam in the first place without a good understanding of domestic politics in America. If you relied only on geopolitics, the explanation would be insufficient. You have got to get into domestic politics, the relations and the competition between the Republican and Democratic parties and all this kind of thing to understand it, and by the same token one would want to make a prognosis about the period of Vietnam in the post American involvement, then one also would have to understand the domestic American politics by which the US would some day leave, and what the likely politics would be after it did leave. Failing to take those factors into account was very dangerous.
I'll give you another illustration of this coming at it from a very different way. One of my temporary duty assignments, post war, was from Christmas of 1974, as I recall I got into the country the day after Christmas on 26 December, and stayed there until about 17 January 1975. Now at that time I was my permanent assignment was a the US Army's command and general staff college at Leavenworth, Kansas. But I left Leavenworth to team up with an officer from the DIA to make an assessment of the situation, and the reason for this was that many people in Washington were getting increasingly skeptical of Ambassador Martin's reporting from Saigon, as to whether it was really realistic or not. And so it was decided to send a couple of people to take look. Now, during this period of TDY, we went all over the country and talked to people from Vietnamese generals down through the field grades to sometimes enlisted men in the military, village chiefs, hamlet chiefs, very wide cross section of Vietnamese society, and a number of Americans. During this period I had occasion to meet with an old friend of mine, General Hai, who was the at that time the division commander of the 7th division in Me Tho, and I had a long supper with general Hai. We had a long conversation about many things, very private. And he told me about an experience of his when he was the director of national police, as a Col. and I remembered him from that time, to, when he had been assigned as the director of national police. As a colonel. And he told me about his interviews he had conducted of Vietnamese communist cadre who the national police captured and how he interviewed them over a period of time, a number of them. And he used to ask them who they honestly believed could win the war. And most of the Hanoi cadre men forthrightly stated that their side would win, not the South Vietnamese. And so he always asked them why. Over a period of time he built a little matrix of their prototypical answers, the answers that he most frequently got. And the reasons that they gave were this, these three: First, they said that Hanoi would win because the North had political unity and the South was factionalized; the second reason that they gave was that the South suffered from endemic corruption and that the North did not tolerate corruption, at least of any magnitude. And third, they said was the difference in the nature of foreign support that the North received and that the South received. They said that the American support might be more effective than the Chinese and the Soviet support for the North on a temporary basis in that the Americans provided very modern weapons and very modern fire power and sent a half a million of their own troops to do a lot of the fighting and that was a help to South Vietnam in the short run. But these cadres said that the thing that they understood was that the Americans could not stay forever, some day they would leave. The South Vietnamese being used to fighting the war with half a million troops in country and with all the support mechanisms, the air and everything, would suffer "lethal withdrawal symptoms," when they were withdrawn, and that would create the opportunity by which the North would be able to seize South Vietnam. And I would say that was a very prophetic analysis.
Now they did do well in 1973, militarily. But I think part of the prophecy was that the high levels of logistical support would not remain.
The war in South Vietnam was infinitely more complex than the war in Korea. In Korea you really had a situation where a communist North was pitted against a non Communist South. And to that extent there were political front lines. After all, some of Ho Chi Minh's most effective allies were communist cadres in the South, and there was a strong communist organization in South Vietnam throughout the war. But by no means defunct after 1968, although some people led themselves to believe that.
When I got into South Vietnam in late December in 1974, I had a very early audience with Ambassador Martin, and Ambassador Martin, he told me that there was no more effective Southern Communists in the Delta, that it was just North Vietnamese Army units controlling the action. But frankly that was not what I saw when I went down there. And in fact General Hai told me specifically that the that there were still local cadre that were committing acts of sabotage against his installations. Those, he said were not NVA, they were locals with legitimate South Vietnamese identification cards. In the end if things are going badly in a war situation it is hard to see how a protracted cover up of the truth can serve our interests. But at least covering it up among those who are responsible for public policy, for the implementation of the war effort, that kind of cover up could never be justified and could never be effective.
We had no press censorship as we did in WWII as we did when we were involved in a struggle for our own survival, we really do play into the hands of a totalitarian adversary, such as Hanoi and its supporters like the Soviet Union and China, which in their own countries totally control the press, which learned the art of playing to the foreign press, they learned the art of disinformation as it applied to the Vietnam situation, so that many prestigious publications in the west were carrying basically the Hanoi line.
I was not inured to the press in Vietnam. But I may have a broader perspective than some of the people who are very bitter in their denunciations of the press, some of it richly deserved. But I think it is very simplistic to say that the press did us in in Vietnam, because to say that almost asks more questions than it answers. In the first place it makes the generic mistake of attributing the loss of Vietnam to a single agency or a single causitive factor, which is itself ridiculous because in fact there were many factors at play. It is even difficult to assess which of the several independent variables that account for the collapse of Vietnam, its difficult to weight any one of them because any number of them played a factor. Some of these were interrelated factors themselves. You get into methodological problems of assessing multicolinearity, the interrelationship among independent variables, and if people don't think in those methodological terms, it is difficult to bring a rigorous analysis to a phenomenon as complex as the fall of South Vietnam. However, having said that, the press really was culpable, in my view, towards the end of the war. But people who do nothing but dump on the role of the press in Vietnam display a very short memory because as a matter of fact, I believe if you look back at a number of American publication in the early days of Vietnam involvement, you would find the press almost uniformly supportive of our effort. So they did not start out negatively. They became negative later. And I remember now reading in various magazines, Life, Time, Newsweek, a number of articles that were quite laudatory of our efforts in Vietnam. And it would be not at all unusual for editors of a magazine to send a reporter out or a reporter and a photographer out to follow some American adviser around and do a really nice write up for the hometown paper, whatever. Here's Captain So and So of the Special forces or somebody advising a Vietnamese battalion and they would say very nice things about what we were trying to do in Vietnam and it was very positive and very upbeat.
And people forget that, some of them because they were probably very young at that time. They turned against the war later. And frankly, some of their later opposition was as unexamined and as superficial as perhaps their early support was also superficial. At least patriotic in its basic sense, but one could hardly say that it was rigorously analytical in all the dynamics involved. You don't want to tar everybody with the same brush, of course. There were, I had good contacts with some very fine journalists throughout the war. People I had very much respect for. But having said that, they certainly did our effort a tremendous amount of damage, once they turned against the war. But to put it in perspective, you have to realize that much of the rhetoric that responsible officials in Washington and Saigon put out about the war was incredible, insulting to the intelligence, many of the things that were happening on the ground didn't compute, that is they didn't correlate to what journalists could see on the ground. So the relationship became more and more adversarial. So none of this, I remember one example, where a briefer at MACV gave a precise body count in a briefing that resulted from an air strike, and somebody asked the airspeed and altitude of the jet fighters delivering the airstrike over a jungle canopy. It was so many hundreds of knots and a thousand or more feet up in the air, and of course the next question was obviously, then how did the pilot render this count through the jungle at this speed and this altitude and speed. And people get their backs up on things of that sort. And people get angry, they know they're being given a line, and they start looking for dirt, and all that sort of thing. But again this calls into question a lot of other things that bear on this, if we're the generic one is, we should not get involved in a serious effort to guarantee, to aid and abet, the national survival of another country unless we do it to win. And if the decision is made that it is important enough to US interests to keep Nicaragua, for example, from going communist, or from being a country dominated by Cuban or Soviet interests, or if the decision is made to keep South Vietnam or South Korea out of the hands of the communists, then the whole range of measures necessary to insure success need to be taken or you don't do it. And it seems that unless you put the economy in the case of South Vietnam, on more of a war time footing, LBJ thought we could have guns and butter, at the same time, unless you're willing to control access by the press, censorship if you will, for that war zone, I'm sure there would be a big hue and cry about it, just as it was in Grenada where they couldn't hit the beach right away. But Grenada was a big success. It was a liberation, the communists were denied access to that area, but anyway we didn't have pictures coming out of Grenada immediately, showing whatever the worst side of the initial conflict might be.
So the message is that we gotta go in with a war-winning strategy when we go into these places and be very circumspect about where you go in.
When I came back in 1975, the report was written by an officer from the DIA. I only contributed trip reports to him, so that I could go right back to Leavenworth and keep teaching my classes. And I gave him a really in effect the results of interviews that I had independently that I had with a number of Vietnamese.
My personal conclusion was more pessimistic than the report that came out, although the report itself was disturbing enough. And it made a big correction for Martin's reporting. But my personal conclusion was that things were going to fall apart very fast. While I was there they took the province capital of Phuoc Long. The South Vietnamese, I'll tell you some of the things I based my impression on. One thing is, the South Vietnamese were already fighting the poor man's war. Denied adequate logistical support they had to ration ammunition in a way that they never had before. The withdrawal effects of the diminution of American logistical support and the withdrawal of American troops would be lethal. And it wasn't just the Vietnamese communist cadre that were telling this to General Hai during these interviews, but there was a very prominent South Vietnamese Colonel, who was saying that over and over again years before this happened. And his name was Col. Nguyen Be, and Col. Be was the commandant of the National Training Center for Rural Development Cadre, or Revolutionary Development Cadre, as the Americans chose to call it in English. But Be was trying to train these cadre that came through the school to operate in a more independent manner in the hamlets and villages from which they came. Going back they were supposed to work with the people back there to build what they called the people's self defense forces, using all kinds of methods to safeguard themselves from communist penetration and communist infiltration. And they were , part of the thrust of Be's thinking and training and theory stated often publicly in speeches and in his writing, which he made available for his own chain of command was that the Americans would go home some day and that they ought to be ready for that day and that they would have to begin sooner rather than later to cut the apron strings and to be able to do more on their own. And that it is to the credit of the South Vietnamese government that they gave him the support that they did by having him in that training center. But it was not something that was institutionalized throughout the country as he would like to have had it be.
So, they were fighting the poor man's war, the North was increasingly strong and rich in its fire power. Logistics. The Defense Attache, at his end of the tour report, predicted in the summer of 1974 that there would be a virtually irresistible violent large scale North Vietnamese invasion and he was looking at it from the standpoint of what he could see. The North Vietnamese were training to do this. In their improvements and in their logistical posture, in their pipelines of petroleum going into the South, with their logistical network, and he could see the improvements through his intelligence gathering. He could see the improvements in their conduct of fire and maneuver, the coordination among infantry and artillery and armor branches, which they were sorely lacking in 1972 when they failed in their effort to take over the South. But he could see all these things and put them together, being a man of eminently sound mind and all, he was one of those guys who believed that if it looks like an elephant and it talks like an elephant then you're probably looking at an elephant. And he said they were coming and that they were going to strike with violent power. He knew this, Murray knew this, and he was very pessimistic and very sad as he left in the summer of 1974. And when I got there the situation was further exacerbated, it had further deteriorated. And in this same context, Congress was denying even a $300 million supplement. And that had another bad impact on the morale of the South Vietnamese. Which is not to say that I believe that the $300 million supplement would have rescued them. But not having it was still another kick in the teeth. And then another thing, in my direct interviews I saw such a pattern of dysfunctional behavior, it reminds you about the old saw of the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer, they were on a downward spiral, they didn't have enough, yet they were making very poor use of what they had.
I'll give you a little story of the hand grenades. My, my. It's a little story but it tells you a lot. I had heard that there was a village down in Cho Gao district down in Binh Duong province in the Delta. That the village chief was described as a very heroic figure who had been marshaling his paramilitary forces, the popular forces, to stand up to the night raids of the Vietnamese communists, but that he was fighting a losing battle and that he had suffered from many desertions in the ranks of the popular forces. I don't remember now but it must have been that 2/3s of them deserted or something like that. Now a Vietnamese friend of mine that used to work with me when I was in Vietnam persuaded me to drive out there to take a look. And meet this guy. I was frankly worried about doing it. Simply because having relocated my family in Kansas I didn't want to get knocked off at the end of the war or something, but he convinced me that I really wouldn't be doing my job if I didn't go out there. I loaded him up in an old civilian car, you couldn't go any more than about ten miles an hour, in little dirt road with big potholes and everything. We got out there and I met this village and talked to him and he was really a tremendous person, and he was resigned to dying in that village, resisting the communists. But he explained that one of the reasons that people were deserting was that he could not give them adequate supplies of ammunition. And a case in point was hand grenades. That the district would not issue him enough hand grenades. He could not provide more than one or two grenades, per popular force soldiers going on night patrols, which resulted in people not wanting to go night patrols. Which resulted in people not wanting to go on night patrols. He felt that the district had sufficient stocks but they were reluctant to hand them out to the district and hamlet level. The story is worth telling in that I found this pattern many many places. I found district chiefs with mortars who wouldn't let their mortars out to villages to use. They felt they had to keep the mortars up in the district compound to protect the district. So if you don't let your front line troops have the equipment because you feel it's too scarce and you want to hoard it for yourself, you simply exacerbate the process of erosion by which the communists quickly arrive at your doorstep. Now, I went up to Saigon several times, and one of my stops in the defense attach office, to meet with major general smith led me to tell him the story that I just told you, about this village chief and the hand grenades. And that led him to introduce me to another major general who had just come in from Bangkok. He had a lot of computer printouts that showed stockage levels. And he what he really told me in effect was that the story that I was telling him couldn't be relevant to anything in the war because he had his computer printouts that showed that the stockage levels of hand grenades in South Vietnam exceeded the highest levels ever, and they had plenty of them. And of course my response was that I knew nothing about the computer print out and second I would not deny the figures that he had in them, but that was what was irrelevant. What was relevant was not how many grenades existed in South Vietnam. What was relevant was that they were not being passed out to the troops. And the political and psychological implications of that. I could envision communist North Vietnamese taking over South Vietnam with high stockages of a whole lot of things in South Vietnam, which they did. But this was the kind of surrealism that confronted me on a number of occasions.
The other thing was that I saw, a lot of Vietnamese told me stories that a lot of them didn't feel that there was any use in continuing the struggle any more against the North. I had a full Colonel tell me that his troops were not going to fight if the North Vietnamese came in force, because the perception was that they would die uselessly. There was no more effective American support, they had been abandoned and the North was getting stronger and stronger. I had stories of parents telling their young sons, if the North Vietnamese come in force, take off your uniform and come home, because it's not worth it. Now that was a departure from the past. They did not use to tell their sons that. Some may have, but never on that scale. But thee was more and more of that. And when you see this and hear this over and over during a two week tdy, you know something is amiss.
It would be very hard for any South Vietnamese person to convey that kind of information to a Vietnamese official and keep his job. I was a nonthreatening figure and a trusted person, somebody who could be trusted to keep secrets, and there was just this terrible deterioration of morale.
I'll tell you a little bitter irony associated with this tdy. And that is, a number of South Vietnamese that I talked to in the Delta, in Long An province specifically, rice farmers and people at that level. I saw evidence and heard evidence from their conversations with me that thee had been a shift in attitudes away from the Communists, away from supporting the communists, toward supporting and in favor of the Saigon government, since 1970, when I did intensive interviews in Long An province and found widespread support for the communists and the national liberation front. What I found was that in 1975, when I went through some of the same areas, I found a decided shift, a sentiment away from the communists, toward support for the Saigon government. Now the bitter irony is, that this shift could not be and was not translated into actual physical support for the Saigon government, because the change in sentiment was accompanied by a perception that, like it or not, the communists were going to win, and therefore, it would be dangerous to stick one's neck out for a losing cause, and few people cared to go on kamikaze missions for causes, no matter how noble.
When Saigon fell I was in Guam to help with the incoming refugees. It was a feeling of great tragedy and in my case, at least, expected tragedy. But, you have to remember there were a lot of people who had been in Vietnam many years, even more than a decade, who knew the Vietnamese well in some ways, and yet remained optimistic almost right up to the end. Personal optimists, in other words, they weren't deceiving other people, they were deceiving themselves. Because I had close friends who told me that they thought I was too pessimistic, and of course my feeling always was that I hoped they were right and I was wrong. But unfortunately that wasn't the case. And I find the loss of South Vietnam for me personally, to be something that bothers me more and more as time passes,rather than less and less. Time is supposed to heal, but for me it doesn't. Because I guess since I expected it to be taken over long before it was taken over, so the fact that they took it over was not a surprise. So I was able to deal with it in the short term. Then, too, in the sense of psychological sense of a death in the family. People go through a sort of subliminal denial process for awhile. But after a while you can't do that anymore. The reality sets in. This is permanent. It's not going to go away.
And the continuation of so much suffering in Vietnam and in Indochina, in Cambodia, the whole protraction of military struggle and everything is depressing, the fact that you have these resourceful industrious people of Vietnam confined and constrained within a communist system, not only a communist system but a system that is even more austere and more harsh by dint of itself being involved in a struggle with China and Cambodia, and that this just spreads the misery. That is part of it. Another reason for me is that at least I am more and more, as time goes on, aware of the tremendous number of opportunities, both personal, in terms of the things that my wife and I could do with her family if there was still a free Vietnam where one could go back and forth, personal opportunities to the geopolitical benefits that would accrue to the US if we were still allied to South Vietnam....
Bill Plante (CBS News) Remembers Vietnam: "We are a Headline Service."
Bill Plante, CBS News. "We Are a Headline Service"


I had been in Vietnam three times before 1975. I had been there for several months in 1964, for eight months in 1967 and for eight or nine months in 1971-72. I grew very fond of the country and the people and became very concerned about the war. It seemed to be going nowhere and it seemed to be doing terrible things to the political fabric of the country and terrible things to the Vietnamese. And yet I never could quite buy the argument that we just ought to walk away. So I never knew quite what to do. I was confused as anybody else about it, I guess. But the point of that is that I had what I felt was a serious interest in the country and the people and the war.
And so when the big final offensive began in the spring of 1975 I watched with absolute fascination, I was based in Chicago at the time, as I had been for some years for CBS. And when I saw Bruce Dunning's piece, the last World Airways 727 leaving Danang, the one that Mike Marriott filmed and Mai Van Duc did, that was it. I just had to go back. So I just volunteered knowing that they would need people probably, that was in late March. And three or four days later I was in Saigon. That's how I came to be there. It was by choice.
I didn't have any trouble getting the assignment. I don't think there were too many people who were anxious to go back. We all assumed that the drive by the North would be successful and that the people in the South would be forced to capitulate and we had no idea how this would happen.
I don't know what the bargaining chips might have been if people thought a partition might have been the result. There were these rumors that swept through Saigon in the final days that the US was sending B52s. But those of us who knew about the War Powers Act, doubted it very much. And of course the way the stage was then set, it was not really possible, except by act of Congress and that was hardly likely.
I came into Tan Son Nhut and came to the bureau. It was being run at the time by Bryan Ellis, our Hong Kong bureau manager and he played a heroic role in my opinion in getting our Vietnamese employees and their families out of there. It was all virtually due to his insistence, I mean New York didn't know quite what to do or what it could do. Ellis even personally drove the US Air Force bus, that he was allowed to use, which he had filled with dependents or Vietnamese employees and their extended families, and bluffed his way through the Vietnamese guards at the gates of Tan Son Nhut to get to the place where the US planes wee departing for Guam. There were about a hundred or so people that Ellis got out.
Ellis was running things, and Dunning was there and Bob Simon was there, Dick Threlkeld was there, Peter Collins was there, Ed Bradley was there. Bradley had been in Cambodia and when Cambodia fell he came out and then stayed in Saigon. I may be missing one or two people.
There was more going on every day than we knew how to deal with. We had a couple of Vietnamese employees whose job it was, who were called journalists, to keep tabs on the daily rumor mill and let us know what was being written and said in Saigon.
The only way you could check things out with any kind of authority at all was on the US side you could talk to people in the Embassy. The people in the embassy and even some of the people in the agency became fairly willing to pass out information. Obviously not anything terribly secret, there wasn't much secret by that time. But we found ourselves able to get pretty good daily estimates as to how the armies were doing. This was helpful. It helped us to assess the chances that the Thieu government, to what degree they stood any chance.
We all went out on the road to Xuan Loc several times, Simon seemed to adopt that as his specialty. he went out there almost every day, I was out there several times. There was always some kind of fighting going on if you went far enough on the road. I remember one day we went down the road and turned around when we hear d shell fire ahead, went back to a staging area where VNAF was preparing to helo-lift troops over Xuan Loc over to the other side, so we all watched. And a jeep came screeching up with Hunter Thompson and Nick Proffitt in it, and Thompson said, "What's going on?" and I said, "There's incoming down the road, so we stopped here." So Thompson switched on his tape recorder and said, "Incoming. Down the road!" That was only one of many times that I saw the good doctor on that trip. He left before the end, I don't know how much before, but I saw him in Hong Kong later.
We were impressed that the South was doing a pretty good job of stopping the North at Xuan Loc, but I don't think any of us were convinced that they could hold on for long because of what was happening in Central Vietnam. The intelligence reports showed that the Northerners were pouring troops down through the Central Highlands and that in the last two weeks there were just on a nonstop March to Saigon.
Most of the refugees couldn't travel that fast, so Saigon wasn't filled with refugees. Most of the refugees that we saw in the Central Highlands were traveling on foot to god-knows-where. Most of them couldn't get to Saigon before the end.
There was great concern in Saigon, but you couldn't call it panic. It was a sort of guarded fear that one sees in certain situations like that.
Thieu was widely regarded at the time as not really being in control of the situation. Nobody was in control, essentially. Some army generals were apparently hanging around. Thieu and others were pleading for US assistance, realizing, I guess that that was their only hope.
We wondered when it came down how we were going to get the hell out of there, starting from about the time I got there, since it seemed inevitable that the place would get taken over. We had many long discussions about staying in which we all participated. There were people who were willing to stay. In the end the company ordered us all out. And the only member of the CBS staff who hung around -- there were two, actually -- one was an Englishman named Eric who functioned as the night office manager, he was one of those wandering souls who liked the country and had been in Asia for years and worked for us answering the telex at night from New York just as a way of feeding himself, and he elected to stay and he kept sending information out on the telex machine for a good 14 hours after the North Vietnamese entered the city. He was the one who described the triumphant parade and the generally reserved attitude that the North took, the quiet reception and so forth. Then we had one or maybe two Vietnamese employees who elected not to be airlifted out.
A couple of stories in the last days struck me. There was so much in the way of human interest. People who had had any contact with the US feared that when the other side took over, which they expected, that if they had had any history of working for the US or any US government agency, that they would be shot on the spot, or maybe not quite as bad, imprisoned and punished. So they flocked to the US Embassy to seek visas to get out. They knew that there were people in the employ of the US who were being given refugee status and flown out to Guam. This had been going on for about two weeks prior to the final day. They were all aware of this and news of it was all over town. These people were nervous and they wanted to get out too. There were thousands of them, they would line up before dawn every morning at the Embassy along the wall waiting to get into the consular section. It was pathetic. We could talk to the ones who could speak English and very quickly get enough material for a very poignant story. In many cases their fears may have been unfounded and in others they may not have been. But it really didn't matter because they were real enough to them.
It took an emotional toll on me, it was bound to and it did. But I don't think that's important. They would come up to me and ask if I could help them. People I didn't even know asked for help. I'd go to the line, and simply because you were a westerner, an American, people would come up and beg you to help them and they would say things like, "I have twenty taels of gold if you can help me to get out of here," which really tears you up.
There were, in the last couple of days, there were some rockets fired on to Tan Son nhut and into some of the poorer sections across the river, by local guerrilla forces apparently.
We worried about the South Vietnamese turning on the Americans. The closest we ever saw it was on the day of the vacuation when the Americans were boarding buses, and the Saigon city policemen, the people we used to call the white mice, because they dressed in white and gray uniforms, cocked his pistol and pointed it at Marriott and pulled the trigger and it misfired. I didn't witness that myself, but that was an awful moment. Everybody knew what was about to happen and yet everybody was trying to be cool about it. Armed forces radio in Vietnam had a prearranged code signal, which was the playing of White Chistmas. That was not a secret to many people, though.
I remember that I came in through Hong Kong. I remember leaving all my good clothes and good luggage in Hong Kong and just taking a cheap bag that I picked up there with an absolute minimum of clothing, since I fully expected to have to leave it all behind. So we sort of went into this with our eyes wide open.
The US government took the position that it was responsible for all Americans there, including journalists. They pressured the major news organizations to cut back on the number of journalists stationed there. And our news organizations in turn pressured us to cut down the size of our bureaus, which is how they wanted me and Simon to go out on equipment flight one night, they couldn't find Simon, but they finally shipped my ass out to Bangkok, and it turned out to be 36 hours before the evacuation began. We didn't know that then. They were rocketing Tan Son Nhut, and the airplane was a DC3 piloted by a former CIA contract pilot who had booze on his breath, and a co-pilot named Floyd who wasn't in much better shape. I went out on that to Bangkok and then put a story on the air from Bangkok, slept into the next day and then the following day in the morning went out to fly to Hong Kong and discovered when we got on the plane from the crew that Saigon traffic center was closed down and had been since 6:00 AM. They had to fly around the peninusla rather than over it at that time. So I went to Hong Kong and went to a television studio and wrapped a report of all of that we knew and put it in the dispatches we were getting from Eric in Saigon, it was still the same day in the United States, even though it was early morning the following day in Hong Kong.
I left at approximately 8 on the night of the 28th and flew to Bangkok where I stayed up all night putting a story on the air. At the airport there was a big crowd and a lot of confusion. And since this was a charter aircraft we didn't go through the main terminal where the crowds and the chaos were. But we still had to talk our way out through immigration and customs. They were in a state of agitation.
We went in an office car which had the right credentials to get through. We were unsure as to how easy it would be to get through under the circumstances.
I was sad upon leaving, terribly sad. And I still am. I don't pretend to know how we might have done it better, but I am sure we could have. We as a nation. Graham Martin was out walking his dog in the embassy compound at that time, they tell me. Martin was a very odd duck. I see him every now and then, I guess he spends much of his time on his farm in Tuscany, between Florence and Sienna.
It was dark when I left. All I could see was the lights below and some parachutes out in the west over the edge of the airfield where the incoming rockets were hitting.
Occasional incoming rockets were hitting. We wondered about SAMS, but we didn't fear it since it hadn't happened previously.
The first thing I wanted to do when I got to Bangkok was call my parents and call my kids. I thanked God that I was out and safe and there were many mixed feelings.
I was thirty seven at that time. The orphan airlift crash touched all of us. It was so big and involved so many people and so many emotions. It's very hard to get that involved in that sort of thing and not feel it.
There were stories I had heard afterward about people being pushed or pulled over the wall of the Embassy. Most of the stuff that was shot the day of the evacuation never got onto the air. It was ferried out to the fleet and it didn't reach us until two or three days later. All the pictures of the helicopters flipping into the sea and the pilots being rescued and so on. It did eventually get on the air, but not to the degree that it would have if we had gotten it earlier.
I would say that what I saw in Vietnam over the course of ten or eleven years helped to sharpen my professionalism as a journalist, I hope. I suppose you could say it made me a better journalist, dealing with what I saw, reporting what I saw.
I find that people are not really very interested in what happened there anymore unless they had a part of it, unless they served there or were close to someone who did. People who were not touched by the war generally don't seem to think much about it anymore. And that's not very surprising. It's abundantly clear in the survey work that we do and that others do that the American people as a whole have no doubt as to where the stand on the issue of US troop involvement, unless our physical security is threatened or really vital interests are at stake. They don't want it.
Even with these years of perspective I can't say that we should have done this and this and this and it would have all have been been different, and it would be presumptuous of me to try.
We are a headline service, that's what we are. And we owe it to the public to do the best headline service we can. But if you are really going to have any idea of what's going on you've got to seek information from other sources. When you go to talk to audience of people or write something you tell people that. I can't disagree with Michael Arlen, television didn't give you an understanding of the political and cultural background of the war, not even after watching television night after night for 15 years.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)